Why the cherry picked quotes in the Sky Sports article? Why not a full flowing answer to the questions he was being asked in the interview? I'll tell you why, because then that would put the interview in its correct context where Hazard would most likely have stated his hope in fighting for his place at Chelsea, building a young and fresh team and hopefully going on to success and glory for many years and therefore would have been considered as a non-story for all the media to hand out to the anti-Chelsea brigade. I am actually with little doubt that the quotes not only come from a different section of his answers, but from different questions even, but are made to look as though Hazard stated all that in a single breath. Chelsea propaganda? The Chelsea site says it as it is and has no hidden agenda in order to bring in the views which is the sole life source of a "journalist's" career. It has no need to twist the truth and portray it in the light that it wants its readers to view it as. If these red top journalists actually reported the facts they would have no jobs as there would be no interest in people who read and believe their stories, like yourself for instance.
