bcz simply you repeating he didn't touch the kid .. when Hazard statement itself fail to confirm your version 100% he did something wrong & stupid .. let us move on .. to defend his action or claiming he didn't not touch him pla pla , is just wrong and subjective
no I'm not, I said Hazard didn't touch him hard enough to merit the reaction that was given from the little ****. Bottom line is whether hazard did it on purpose or not.
we both agree he must had touched him .. but disagree on how much he hurt him? ..will that matter to FA? NO
Does that mean he'll be back for the City game? If so then I'm glad the FA decided not to flex their muscles on this one because I'm hoping Chelsea can take points off them in that game.
My only surprise in this whole sorry affair is that John Terry wasn't charged by the FA over it. I mean he was in the same country at the time.