I'm not against dogs - we live in a row of 4 detached houses, we are the only ones who don't have a dog, but you barely hear a thing from the other houses, it's just this yappy little **** who gets chucked out the house when he's making too much noise for his chav owners - I thought by buying a nice house on a new build estate I'd be away from the chavy ASBO behaviour (these lot aren't so bad, they just make noise with EVERYTHING they do - there is zero subtlety in their lives)
I read that a man got that sick of his neighbours yappy little dog he drowned it in a bucket of water. A bit extreme.
Probably extreme but if he had to listen to it months on end I can understand why he did it. I don’t think you would think of the consequences until it’s to late.
I'm no expert but I'm fairly sure the dog has to have some sort of collar fitted for any device to work? I might be wrong like.
This will not solve your problem, but we had awful neighbours, so we moved as quick as we could,We are now very glad we did, much better house and area
When I spoke to the council, they sent a letter to a neighbour, I was not required to speak to them first
I had to show evidence to my CIJ cil that I had made efforts in mediating the situation with my neighbour before they ( the council) would step in. I didn’t need the council in the end…… at least for now. Fingers crossed.
****ing do the bastards, people like this turn decent areas into **** holes. They make reasonable folks lives worse. They shouldn’t be given the opportunity to do this. I ****ing hate chavvy ****ty bastards with a passion. They know exactly what they are doing too.
Just to boil your piss a bit more, this lad next door has 2 green bins. He took the one from his old house with him like a standard knobby chav
Piece of scummy ****. He would probably make a sledge out of it for his kid if it wasn’t for warmer winters and little snow these days. Another problem with enforced mixing of people, large new build estates have to have 25% affordable houses - its compulsory and not including affordables means no planning permission for the developer. What this means is folk who buy their own pay through the nose for the property while the scum bags get great houses with cheap rent to live next door and drag the area down. We looked at a new build about 12 years ago and the sales woman gave us some bollocks about how it’s a lovely community and that there was a window cleaner with 5 kids living in no.2 and a barrister at no. 4 etc. I wouldn’t want to live next door to a sodding window cleaner chucking his ladders about early every morning (no offence to window cleaners) but these houses were £650k 12 years ago so why should anyone have to pay 2k+ a month mortgage to live next door to an affordable house of the same size/design where the rents £450 a month. We didn’t bother going any further than viewing the show home that sales pitch was enough to put me off. The only good thing was they told you which plots were affordable houses so at least you knew from the start.
Get some cctv fitted with audio before you speak to them. Once it's all fitted, give them a knock and make a reasonable request that the dog is too loud (get it on camera) . If it continues you will have the evidence all ready to send to the Council when you report it. If that doesn't work, be more like Burt....
This is definitely an issue. The problems that have existed on this estate have come from the 25%, or some of the 25% at least
Exactly, I might sound like a snob and although I wouldn’t tar every affordable house tenant with the same brush, there’s definitely a larger proportion of them whose lifestyles don’t align with those around them (hanging about on the front lawn drinking cheap lager from a can listening to loud ****ty music and shouting down the street at their feral kids to come in at midnight) as an example while the normal folk are working their bollocks off to pay a huge mortgage, some of which is in direct subsidy of the houses these people occupy. It stinks quite frankly, the policy needs a major rethink.
I'm 100% a snob and I do not agree with the instruction that every new estate has to have an element of social housing. There have been a small number of issues (cars being broken into, damage to gardens and property, cars screeching round the estate at all hours) and unfortunately it all comes from one area of the estate. I know people who have moved out after 12 months because of who they are living next to. I know this sounds terrible, and as someone who working in SH for 3 years in the 2010s I know that the vast majority of folk are good and clean living, but there is always that element that spoil it for others.....
Completely agree with this. It boils my piss that you work hard all your life save up and buy a nice new house that you've grafted your arse off for just to be lumbered next to some scummy little ****s who pay next to **** all for there house probably get 100% of it paid for through benefits as theyve generally got a tribe of kids with them and they have zero intention of ever working a day in their lives. I've got nowt against folk who want big families but make sure you can afford to look after them don't rely on the rest of us working and paying taxes to fund your ****ing lives. Worse thing is most of these scummy little pasty munching kids grow up and do exactly the same thing. I like a pasty as much as the next man by the way but you know the type I'm meaning. I envy folk growing up 60 years ago. Everyone in the same boat grafting their arse off and generally not having a pot to piss in but community spirit was high folk looked out for each other helped each other with day to day tasks and got along well. The society we live in today of I'll do **** all and get bailed out by the state ****ing stinks. Anyway rant over I hope you get sorted with this problem and these little ****s get evicted to Syria.
