Do we really want...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
It was just a bit of a daft laugh <ok> (got it from George Caulkin's twitter), although it could potentially be a problem if he is one of the bling bling boys like those we've had in the past - more concerned with the pay cheque than the performance.
 
Barton and Nolan will hopefully have him in under their wings..

Tbh, he was amazing for city then mancini brought in those big names and never played him and for Villa, Houiller never wanted him, it wasen't his signing and he doesn't fit in his style of play, I think he'll be good for us.
 
It does seem like a bit of an odd transfer. I can't see him being a regular part of our starting XI and Kranjcar would have been a much better transfer!
 
**** cars, **** house, **** tattoo, **** player, **** dog.

I'd shag his wife but apart from that I wouldn't trade anything I have for anything of his, and he's a Premier League footballer. Sums up what a dick he is.
 
Come on guys he is a decent player and i think with our team spirit, we will get the best out of him, plus its a loan deal, so if he doesnt make it work we can easily send him back
 
i hope he plays amazingly so he proves you all wrong

I think that's what we all want.

You should really learn the joys of pessimism. If things go better than expected, great! If things go bad, your opinion has been justified. WIN:WIN <ok>
 
Personally i think his head is shaped more like a light bulb.but lets be honest there plenty of truly horrific looking footballers that you'd love to have in a black and white shirt: rooney, tevez...chadwick ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.