Diving

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Magic Laudrup 11 said:
Aye.

We also want all the fannies issuing death threats to Collum to be arrested and get on the front page of the papers <ok>
Click to expand...

Death threats?

Has anyone issued a death threat to Collum?

Please tell me you're not talking about some numpty on twitter - there'd be no room for any trials in Scotland's courtrooms if they prosecuted anyone tweeting anything about Lennon dying <doh>
 
Bib Fortuna's Maw said:
Please tell me you're not talking about some numpty on twitter - there'd be no room for any trials in Scotland's courtrooms if they prosecuted anyone tweeting anything about Lennon dying <doh>
Click to expand...

Isn't that what the new legislation covers? besides its up to the PF to decide whether or not to try and get a conviction.
 
MaskedDunger 4*5/4*5 said:
Isn't that what the new legislation covers? besides its up to the PF to decide whether or not to try and get a conviction.
Click to expand...

They can shootie-in then.

****s don't think before they put things on Twitter or Facebook all the time - I'm scarcely on Facebook, try not to have any heidbangers on it and I still see something about killing Lennon every couple of days (ran over by a bus and shot after being de-limbed the last two <laugh>).

Point is, that's not a death-threat.

It would be absolutely typical of you lot to talk something like this up and then talk it down when it's aimed at Lennon.
 
Bib Fortuna's Maw said:
It would be absolutely typical of you lot to talk something like this up and then talk it down when it's aimed at Lennon.
Click to expand...

In the same way this topic is aimed at you lot being typical about diving when its us doing it but when yous do it its a penalty?

Besides i think you're all sad as **** for using any social networking sites anyway.
 
MaskedDunger 4*5/4*5 said:
In the same way this topic is aimed at you lot being typical about diving when its us doing it but when yous do it its a penalty?

Besides i think you're all sad as **** for using any social networking sites anyway.
Click to expand...

In a manner, yes.

Aluko dived and the resultant penalty won you two points - yet the OP states that you want the same punishment for a perceived dive when nothing was awarded on the day.

You're essentially demanding off-field parity for on-field disparity.
 
Bib Fortuna's Maw said:
In a manner, yes.

Aluko dived and the resultant penalty won you two points - yet the OP states that you want the same punishment for a perceived dive when nothing was awarded on the day.

You're essentially demanding off-field parity for on-field disparity.
Click to expand...

So you'd have rather not drawn with 1 team this season than won the league cup? I'd suggest the league cups worth a lot more than 2 points, especially considering the league table just now.

The OP doesn't suggest at all that he be retrospectively punished (I don't believe he can be anyway) but If i referee'd that match I'd have sent him off for his behaviour afterwards.

The OP suggests that you are all typical hypocrites when it comes to diving.
 
Yesterday the buns had their say on the penalty , in today's paper they asked twelve football people yes/no was it a penalty 7 yes 5 no .Lets go back in time and look at the favourable penalty decisions gone in Rangers favour in league cup finals .1984two Ally dives resulted in two Rangers penalties,1987 Butcher fouls Airken penalty to Rangers . Against Aberdeen another famous Mccoist dive when a goal down and against Dundee utd when united winning 1-0 were denied a stonewall penalty to make the game safe . No doubt there are more incidents gone in their favour like the Hartson disallowed goal in 2003 cup final , 3 yards onside
 
harryhood67 said:
Yesterday the buns had their say on the penalty , in today's paper they asked twelve football people yes/no was it a penalty 7 yes 5 no .Lets go back in time and look at the favourable penalty decisions gone in Rangers favour in league cup finals .1984two Ally dives resulted in two Rangers penalties,1987 Butcher fouls Airken penalty to Rangers . Against Aberdeen another famous Mccoist dive when a goal down and against Dundee utd when united winning 1-0 were denied a stonewall penalty to make the game safe . No doubt there are more incidents gone in their favour like the Hartson disallowed goal in 2003 cup final , 3 yards onside
Click to expand...

<laugh> Get a ****in life
 
No idea why he went down. Dive in my book. He's done it before though, when he's had the chance to ****ing shoot, and he's gone down under a 'challenge'.

Nothing beats sitting back and watching buns console themselves because Celtic can't win every trophy this season.

Win some, you lose some; a double still to come.
 
So it's ok for Rangers to cheat in finals,the Rangers / Aberdeen hatred all comes from favourable decisions going in Rangers favour against Aberdeen in cup finals , the Simpson /durrant thing started it but Ally dives carried it on. You had video evidence of Stokes dive yesterday which we never got a pen , let's see mccoist dive in 1990 that you DID get a penalty for
 
All I am doing is pointing out , the decision with Stokes never went in our favour yet you Huns called him a cheat . I am pointing out those decisions HAVE gone in Rangers favour not once or twice in league cup finals but five or six times .Rangers at their happiest when cheating . Least we will not see your club in cup finals for many a year .
 
Trevor at no time have I said I thought it was a penalty . At the game I thought it might have been, I was in the posh seats !! As I left a guy had seen it on the telly and said never a pen and I agree with him.Might not have been a booking though .
 
Ive seen it now ; thought a penalty could easily been given - I reckon he slides in from the back and takes stokes leg just below the knee....doesnt get the bal...though gollum wouldve got the other side of the conspiracy theories if he`d given it...tough one in extra time...all in all , seen them given, seen them denied , but I thought the booking was harsh...just because there is contact doesnt mean it has to be a penalty, just because a player goes down doesnt mean he mustve dived.
 
It was a definite dive or simulation whatever you want to call it. His legs just gave way. When he watches it back he'll be raging cos the keeper had fallen backwards onto his arse because he expected a shot. If stokes had stayed up he had an empty net to aim at <laugh>

PS he was lucky not to see red for his reaction
 
rogueleader said:
Ive seen it now ; thought a penalty could easily been given - I reckon he slides in from the back and takes stokes leg just below the knee....doesnt get the bal...though gollum wouldve got the other side of the conspiracy theories if he`d given it...tough one in extra time...all in all , seen them given, seen them denied , but I thought the booking was harsh...just because there is contact doesnt mean it has to be a penalty, just because a player goes down doesnt mean he mustve dived.
Click to expand...

Correct, but Stokes did dive.

I consider myself quite a fair minded individual and it's 100% a dive.

All the slow mo replays show that.

If there was contact, which is inconclusive, it would've been minimal, and even after when there might've been contact, he took another step then fell.

So it's a dive, 100% in my mind.
 
Edge / Trevor the penalty wasn't given , why are you acting as if it did ??? Can either of you recall mccoist falling over against Aberdeen in the league cup final when nobody was near him , now that one was given , miller and mccleish went mad Rangers score and go on and lift the trophy .Cheats prospered that day .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back