If it is really that easy to spot, then wtf is the manager doing not managing the situation and always making his choices in the best interest of the team? This means his choices should never downgrade the team, especially on a long-term basis. If choices made by the manager affect the long-term performances, then the manager is putting himself ahead of the team. Anyway, how did we even get into all these crazy speculations about who is siding with whom? The fact that we are talking about this demonstrates that the manager is not sufficiently doing HIS job MANAGING the team. The results are there for all to see.
I don't know why Rashford is Teflon, I really don't, but I've no doubt whatsoever he's the snake in the grass. ****ing obvious. Anyway, match thread incoming!
