But I'm younger, and a wee bit more petite than you. Ok she can suck it, but when I go off, it's on Kimberleys face, not in her gob. Deal? (moderator in Forum Tone-Lowering shocker...)
Well I may not reflect the views of the majority of Sunderland supporters but I was honest in my assessment of both teams. If the majority of fans want to follow 'sheep like' like C'est and believe we really have better players than the mags then it is our fans who are deluded.
On this we agree. Lol I've made my points about newcastle supporting players playing for us and I stick by it but I have family and friends who are mags and dont hate all things b&w. How could any full blooded male hate Cheryl Cole ffs. Lol
Its not a case of being sheep daft lad but rather anyone who says they are a Sunderland fan but then adds that they would still not be happy witha 2-0 win over the mags is a just a big fanny imo.
Honest view is that it still won't make up for the 1-5. Do you really have to add a childish insult to everything you post as well?
So until we beat them 5-1 you're going to post this drivel are you? **** me we're in for a long haul here then.
How is my post drivel? You have focused on one point. I asked you to make an argument for our players over the mags players. CAn you leave the one thing you have focused upon and tell me an antithesis to my main argument that we are lacking the class of some of the mags players.
Okay here you are then. You slate Adam Johnson despite the lad having played only 2 games for us (one with an obvious stomach complaint); you say our back 4 are ****e despite not once mentioning that our best back 4 havent even played together yet and that they might just do so v the craas. I wouldn't swap Mig for Krul or Harper; Rose for Santon; Bardsley for Simpson; Fletcher for Ba; Johnson for Gutierez; or Cuellar/JOS for Taylor. The 4 best players the mags have are Colo, Cabaye, Ba and Ben Arfa and I'd have them in a flash. Tiote is too hitty missy and anyway, he's a pansy. Our central midfield such as Colback and Larsson lack pace and control and things have to change there but I'd sooner see Vaughan and Gardener in there anyway. Sessegnon showed little glimpses against Man City but not enough and he needs to start performing but when he clicks, he is fantastic. Our best 11 available are likely to be: Mig Bardo, JOS, Cuellar, Rose Larsson, Gardener, Sessegnon, Vaughan, Johnson Fletcher Westwood, Bramble, Meyler, Campbell, Saha, Colback, McClean (if fit) You may think they are ****e. I don't and I don't have to listen to your negative drivel every day constantly putting them down. Of course we all want a better team to watch but this one has started with 7 points from a possible 18 available but could easily have been much better. Had the game v Reading (and I do think we could have won it) gone ahead and we won; we held out for another minute at W Ham it could have been 12 from 21 and we would be in the top 7 now. Would you still be moaning like **** then? Probably you would actually. We know it's not great and we can all have a moan about it but you're constantly twisting and saying our players are ****e without ever offering positives. They are not ****e at all. Nuff said.
I have to say after watching your games this year, Mignolet is slightly superior to Krul in my book. Krul won us a lot of points last year but Mig seems to be doing the same for you from what I've seen, some of his saves are just stupid. At risk of this becoming another Sunderland - Newcastle XI thread, I think this team would be boss: ...........Mignolet Santon Taylor Coloccini Rose HBA Tiote Cabaye Sessegnon .........Ba Fletcher In form Cisse, Cattermole and Johnson would also be neck and neck with their counterparts in that team. Johnson is a funny one for me. When you signed him I was thinking, ****, one of the best English players there is. But as it stands it is over 2 years since I have seen him play well. I still fully believe he will come good with a run of games, just for now I will reserve judgement until he has done just that.
