If anyone is looking for a laugh go take a look at the euro 2020 or World Cup threads. It's funny how many were defending Garethball.
Two City flags. About the most interesting thing about tonight’s game.
You must log in or register to see images
That you @Newlandcasual2 ?Two City flags. About the most interesting thing about tonight’s game.
You must log in or register to see images
I think there's another one under the Coventry flag? If you zoom in it's draped upright partly showing and looks like it says ULL C?Two City flags. About the most interesting thing about tonight’s game.
You must log in or register to see images
Clinton Baptiste? I'm hearing the word,...I wonder if the psychic Phil foden visited saw that coming.
Agree but it goes further than that. A back four against a lone forward. Stones should be pushing into midfield like he does for Citeh. Full backs should be bombing forward and or 'inverting' into midfield. We have 2 of the quickest players in the tournament in defence so can afford to push much higher up. It was absolute typical ****e from Southgate.Also, playing two holding midfielders and not giving one license to get forward is like wearing a belt and braces. For ****’s sake, drop Alexander-Arnold, stick Bellingham next to Rice as a number 8, move Foden central and have an actual winger on the left to provide pace and directness.
I think he’ll start Gallagher next game and we’ll see more of the same.
Southgate did say in his interview that AA in midfield was an experiment as there wasn’t a natural replacement for Phillips. If that’s the case the he clearly would have left it the same in style. One tournament too many for GS I’m afraid.I have absolutely no idea what to make of that game.
It was really really really poor - no question about it. But I can't see why?
We switched the entire forward line - and got worse. Eze was really poor and after bright starts - Watkins and Bowen faded too. I actually thought Saka and Foden were doing OK (certainly better).
There's a lot not adding up about this tournament. For a while, Southgate has been loyal (maybe overly loyal at times?) but now it feels as though he's taken a few risks with his squad - but on the pitch it doesn't look risky at all.
My suspicion is that the lack of progression up the pitch lies with who takes the role next to Rice. Its clearly not working with Trent - but at the same time there's no other obvious option. Mainoo isn't a typical DM and Wharton is very inexperienced at any sort of top level. Gallagher doesn't seem creative enough and I'm loathed to put Bellingham in the 8 position because his performance against Serbia was our best attacking show at the tournament so far.
Maybe we needed to stay loyal for one more tournament to someone who has played there before? Would Henderson, Phillips or Dier have (in an absurd way), been a better answer?
If that's the question - we really do have problems.
Bellingham was disappointing today so not sure that logic stacks up. Bellingham would probably have run the Sebia game as a no 8 anyway, in fact he dropped deeper a lot of the time anyway. Also we may then have seen the real FodenI have absolutely no idea what to make of that game.
It was really really really poor - no question about it. But I can't see why?
We switched the entire forward line - and got worse. Eze was really poor and after bright starts - Watkins and Bowen faded too. I actually thought Saka and Foden were doing OK (certainly better).
There's a lot not adding up about this tournament. For a while, Southgate has been loyal (maybe overly loyal at times?) but now it feels as though he's taken a few risks with his squad - but on the pitch it doesn't look risky at all.
My suspicion is that the lack of progression up the pitch lies with who takes the role next to Rice. Its clearly not working with Trent - but at the same time there's no other obvious option. Mainoo isn't a typical DM and Wharton is very inexperienced at any sort of top level. Gallagher doesn't seem creative enough and I'm loathed to put Bellingham in the 8 position because his performance against Serbia was our best attacking show at the tournament so far.
Maybe we needed to stay loyal for one more tournament to someone who has played there before? Would Henderson, Phillips or Dier have (in an absurd way), been a better answer?
If that's the question - we really do have problems.
Bellingham was disappointing today so not sure that logic stacks up. Bellingham would probably have run the Sebia game as a no 8 anyway, in fact he dropped deeper a lot of the time anyway. Also we may then have seen the real Foden
Southgate did say in his interview that AA in midfield was an experiment as there wasn’t a natural replacement for Phillips. If that’s the case the he clearly would have left it the same in style. One tournament too many for GS I’m afraid.