please do show the 22 second collapse? because your very own NIST made no mention of this and put the collapse at less than 11 seconds
All the explanations have been given on here Edge. Try and read. I know you're not a complete wAlloper.
HERE IS A REAL DEBUNK OF THE NIST REPORT WATCH IT IF YOU DARE CALAPRAWN [video=youtube;OuGI82tOhEI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuGI82tOhEI[/video]
You do realise that in stress situations people's minds do play tricks on them so when they heard one thing their minds made them think it was something else entirely and when one person told the story one way everyone else followed suit.
This is where you have failed again eddieee you state: beacause the temps were not even half of what required to melt bare steel The steel never melted did it? all it needed to do was weaken it and the temperature was more than enough for that and then you have a domino effect once the steel wanes, simple science but I will help you out more yet eddieeeee. unprotected steel collapsed within 2 1/2 hours in Madrid fire without being hit by anything The Madrid and Caracas tower fires lasted much longer yet those steel framed buildings never collapsed completely Neither building had the tube in a tube design used at the WTC Unlike the towers, both buildings had their steel columns encased in concrete The steel which was not protected with concrete in the Madrid towers also collapsed early on just like in the towers Steel loses half of its strength when heated to just 1200F." Thermal images used by NASA show the heat at 1400F
cap your a sound fella, imo. and one who has his head screwed on, again imo. based on what i see from your comments on here but the mind playing tricks under stress is something i argued when i look at the precision of the attacks, especially the pentagon one which needed more than a few piloting hours to carry out yet its invalid as an argument because it doesnt suit. for what its worth the planes may have bought down the twin towers and it may be hard to ascertain exactly how it happened. but tower 7 and the guff around that? please
I don't get your thinking, all explanations for 9/11 are completely logical but look on the other hand at Theories and they are just insane
the temps were not even a quarter of what it takes to melt steel madrid building burned for 19 hours in fires twice as hot as the wtc, the main structure did not collapse. NIST expiriment to determine fireproof dislodging consisted of firing a shotgun at a steel plate, not even a beam, a plate Watch the video i posted, it goes through NIST report with meticulous detail and if you really are an unbiased person, you will not be quoting NIST after it. I doubt you will watch it, you dont want to be bored by the facts.
He never said that they were or that the steel melted. You need to read people's posts more carefully
cal you are embarrassing yourself now the explanation you speak of are theories themselves. The official report and story is a theory, just like any other, you are delusional because you are so set against believing an inside job.
I have watched it before I am open minded and I watched another video debunking it and even in this quote you have 2 things wrong that anyone can easy check out I'll let you guess what and I will leave you with this site and tell me that the towers didn't just fall: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842
seriously? do you believe they are logical? look i know some of the conspiracy theories are outrageous, but the 'official' version' equals them at times and exceeds at others. It doesnt help that they keep changing their minds as i say NIST admit to making educated guesses and FEMA put the probability of the official version as low. Its like the afghan war, i see on programmes like QT that we are back on the get bin laden vibes, whereas we have gone round the houses to why the troops were in there
even if steel had weakened a the impact zone, it was minimal and can not explain a whole building collapse
As I have said I am open minded with theorys and why we are at War now as I don't know, but what I do know after studying 9/11 for a college project is that the Twin Towers fell naturally no demolition, no FBI agents flying planes in there. There is cold hard facts as to why it fell have a look at that link I posted before it explains everything and even shows up the Con Theorists for lying about who said what. If you missed it here it is again but you won't ever question the towers again after reading it.
Type it into Google or Youtube and take your pick buddy, and maybe get your head out of your arse and accept that I have proven fact after fact to your theorys, now like I said if you want to talk about a REAL conspiracy I'm here
