We were ****,but we should have got at least a point at your ****-hole,swings and roundabouts. If this is a ****ing awful thread why bother posting on it?
I believe not, though there is little difference between the two nowadays. What do I gain? Ossie's wisdom and insight for starters.
Looks lie Chavbus may need to look again for a manager http://www.express.co.uk/sport/foot...nager-Antonio-Conte-denies-agreement-in-place
It depends on what he meant. If it was "We've spent absolutely ****loads of money and should have a much better team and they'd have won", then he'd be right.
As Twist says above though, Chelsea have lost the one thing they had which was the financial muscle to outbid and buy whoever they wanted to field the strongest team, all the while keeping other top players on the bench/reserves just to deny their rivals the players' services. Chelsea, lowest of the "big London 4" this season.
They've still got enough financial muscle to seriously **** most teams over, though. Their wage bill's bloody enormous and I'm sure that their next manager will be pushing the FFP rules to the limit. Shouldn't have one right at the end, though!
Oh dear. Lee: When you create a WuM thread, surely it is silly to be seething with anger on it three days later. Self-defeating even?
