Just just never know..
Getting moyes is like having an ugly bird no one else wanted, or winning the Europa instead of the CL
See what I did there?!?....


..
the guy is more consistent manager in PL with lowest resources .. how that is a risk?
is he better of Jose?
it was 50-50 for me .. actually in a polls, Moyes was ahead of Jose here
Europa league will be for you guys .. no Abra money anymore, Jose would had big Qs to answer on how he will cope without money ? i think the Europa league will be for you guys, and you seem to be allreay over the moon for winning it .. what i can say ? you fit that competition well![]()
..
the guy is more consistent manager in PL with lowest resources .. how that is a risk?
is he better of Jose?
it was 50-50 for me .. actually in a polls, Moyes was ahead of Jose here
Europa league will be for you guys .. no Abra money anymore, Jose would had big Qs to answer on how he will cope without money ? i think the Europa league will be for you guys, and you seem to be allreay over the moon for winning it .. what i can say ? you fit that competition well![]()
..
the guy is more consistent manager in PL with lowest resources .. how that is a risk?
is he better of Jose?
it was 50-50 for me .. actually in a polls, Moyes was ahead of Jose here
Europa league will be for you guys .. no Abra money anymore, Jose would had big Qs to answer on how he will cope without money ? i think the Europa league will be for you guys, and you seem to be allreay over the moon for winning it .. what i can say ? you fit that competition well![]()
Purley:4754782 said:..
the guy is more consistent manager in PL with lowest resources .. how that is a risk?
is he better of Jose?
it was 50-50 for me .. actually in a polls, Moyes was ahead of Jose here
Europa league will be for you guys .. no Abra money anymore, Jose would had big Qs to answer on how he will cope without money ? i think the Europa league will be for you guys, and you seem to be allreay over the moon for winning it .. what i can say ? you fit that competition well![]()
Currently the best English team in Europe![]()
Currently the best English team in Europe![]()
a poor consolation for current champions league winners dumped out of the CL tournament...hahaha
based on winning the fifth ranked trophy available...a poor consolation for current champions league winners dumped out of the CL tournament...
I'd disagree with this statement in part. Kenny came back to us under Rafa in an ambassadorial role, much in the way many are suggesting that SAF will be working at OT. Once Rafa was gone, Kenny presented himself as a choice, but Statler & Waldorf were too wary of appointing someone with even more emotional connection with the fans than Rafa, and reactionarily chose a more pliable candidate instead - not for footballing reasons (IMO anyway).Ferguson's presence could potentially be both a blessing and a curse. A blessing to Moyes as a sounding board. But a curse because every time United lose or are losing, TV cameras will pick him out in the crowd and people will say 'what would Fergie have done?'. Liverpool had a similar scenario a few years back when Kenny Dalglish came back to work for them, initially under Benitez and then under Hodgson. It was no secret that he wanted the Liverpool job again and his presence undermined their managers at the time, albeit both didn't help themselves. Dalglish then became manager again and we all know how disastrous that turned out to be. If Dalglish hadn't come back, there wouldn't have been an itch to scratch.
Obviously it would unrealistic to expect Ferguson to sever his ties with Manchester United and he still has much to offer. I do think it would be best if he isn't there in public eye all the time, however, but more in the background or indeed travelling the world in his ambassadorial role.
I suppose the parallels with McGuinness and Paisley are reasonable. As you say, its how things turn out on the pitch will determine whether SAF's presence is considered help or hinderance.Too early to say imo. Shankly's presence at Liverpool was widely seen as a big burden to Paisley, but it didn't stop him succeeding. And it's debatable how much of Utd's decline post Busby was down to Busby's presence, or down to the fact that McGuinness and O'Farrell were simply poor replacements who just weren't up to the challenge and left Docherty with a poor squad and an impossible job.
I personally think SAF will only be a damaging presence if Moyes proves not to be up to the job. As long as we're still comfortably in the top three and performing well in Europe then the shadow of SAF will not be particularly large. It's only if Moyes fails on the pitch and in the dressing room that the presence of SAF may become an issue, and if Moyes is failing there then he would be doomed with or without SAF looking over his shoulder.
I'd be interested to hear how you think the fanbase will react if, after the first 10 games you happen to be bottom half? After all, a new manager, having to bed in new ideas can disrupt players' confidence and flow.
Are you sure about this? Absolutely sure?
the 10 years old kid is back againShwan is as French as Joey Barton's accent.
why you didn't call us "Manure" like you do in your section everytime or you just chicken out like any 10 years old kid? i said it before .. you don't take a disagreement like an adult .. so Bravo .. well done 
