David Fairclough To Start?
- Thread starter Oldsparkey
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
100% agree.
Fairclough was always down the pecking order due to better options taking preference in the position he played. I don't see that with what is available at this moment in time with the Gunner.
Fairclough was always down the pecking order due to better options taking preference in the position he played. I don't see that with what is available at this moment in time with the Gunner.
Assuming we start with two upfront again, Whitts and two wide men from Conway, Noone or Kimbo are certanties to take three of the four midfield spots, where does that leave us?
Gunnar, Mutch or the Don for the other spot?
I know who I'd play from the off - hope Malky agrees.
Gunnar, Mutch or the Don for the other spot?
I know who I'd play from the off - hope Malky agrees.
Malky said in his pre match interview that he didn't believe in never changing a winning side.
That beggars the question - is that the one that started, or the one that finished?
Personally I'd start the one that finished the Palace game. Rudy in for Heidar, Gunnar for Mutch, and give Mason a start for a change. Noone off the bench against a tiring Millwall defence could be a masterstroke.
That beggars the question - is that the one that started, or the one that finished?
Personally I'd start the one that finished the Palace game. Rudy in for Heidar, Gunnar for Mutch, and give Mason a start for a change. Noone off the bench against a tiring Millwall defence could be a masterstroke.