Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Maybe you should go back to posting conspiracy loon in response to arguments about data adjustments and altered historical records

 

Disappointed in you @donga I thought you were above this sort kneejerk cack I mean I get your hardon for 9\11 sort of, but this topic and the response to a post you didn't read..

cop on

 

Better than posting links charts etc that you haven't read or understood.

Is it OK for me to ask a question about climate change now?

 

What questions? You've not asked me any questions.

I asked you a question though, and you're still squirming away from it. It's hilarious btw.

Carry on squirming - starring a mad Irish bloke in Finland.

Co- starring an ounce of homegrown skunk

 

Not in reference to any individual. I dunno why but I always expect better from a Red.. strange that, tribalism..

 

I have not asked you any questions?
brb, will get a bunch of questions you ignored. I wonder what your response will be.

 

You've now resorted to responding to posts to other people. You really have issues

 

I didn't need to Google the following:

The Lusitania was sunk in WWI and had absolutely nothing to do with deliberately leaving the Soviets to fight on their own against the Nazis (your claim).

George Bush senoir had no role in the 'agreement' between granddad Bush and Nixon in the 50's, and that by the 60's when Nixon was being backed by other shadowy forces he was already an ex-vice president, and not the young maleable huckster you portrayed him as.

James the II wasn't even born when laws about indentured service were passed that you referred to.

I most ****ing certainly did not need Google anything re the utter tosh you wrote about the moon-landings - certainly not that drivel about the Duke photograph. The only parts I cut-and-pasted were from Clavius, simply because it was easier than typing it all out again and it systematically demolished your nonsensical claim about cameras and radiation.

I did Google the tuff about your claim about polar bear numbers vastly increasing. I'm glad I did, but I apologise that the 'fact' I found about the original 1950's estimates (on which this argument was based) were utterly bogus seemed to utterly embarrass you. Or at least they should have, had you one iota of self-awareness.

 

So, to continue your your illogical nonsense after posting nonsense to a point you didn't even read, you now continue to blab on about irrelevant points of previous debates.

It is historical fact that they sent the ship into Sub infested waters known to be sub infested waters, with no escorts.

The argument was the bush family, not george v Prescott. I conceded I was incorrect, twice and here you are again, but the point remained the family are dodgy as ****
Now apart from being weird like Terrific, this is not the argument, nor the topic, this is you trying to drag me into some copy paste wum fantasy.

You have recited the same things you said in your last past and ignored every single salient point made by me, which unless I am mistaken is ******ed.

Are you really as thick as all that? I hope you are drinking because otherwise you read embarrassing, given how this conversation evolved.

Essentially you are not reading anything, just posting. I remember you accusing me of that often, not that I stack up in memory what YOU do because well, you are no one. So it's odd that you do.. More evidence you only remember irrelevant things

 

Can't believe we have reached defcon 2 so quickly tonight.

Do you want to start talking about climate change now?

 

@donga kloppo is this your other account, right now you both read very similar, bitterness is about the same too

 

Think I said all along, Sis, that my position on climate change/global warming was that it was PROBABLY happening, but I wasn't convinced with the man-made argument. But I haven't moved on my puzzlement at your debating stance, and I said so when you quoted another sceptic in Brian May. He doesn't go around calling people 'tards and sheeple and God knows what else because he disagrees with them. And at least he IS definite in his anti-pollution post - something you need to think about when you're supping from the same spoon as the petro-chemical countries.

 

I'm not bitter, I am quite happy sitting here laughing at this thread yet again.

Do you want to talk about global warming now?

 

I love the self delusion and massive hypocrisy he's applying here.

Everyone who disagrees with him or has the temerity to point out the obvious flaws in his latest cut and pasted graph, or point out the backgrounds (and therefore the potential drivers or lack of credibility) of the supposed experts that he's posted the blogs of - is a 3 minute expert or an idiot relying on Google.

That'd be the same google that he used to find the graphs and the blogs on......but he did it ages ago you know......therefore his knowledge is supreme - because it's supposedly older

What stunning logic. A student who acquires a fact today, is not as worthy as the one who acquired it 5 years ago.....

 

Dude, what is with your "every mistake you ever made" like what 3 4 mistakes you noted, since like 2011? **** off 5 ****ing years.. better still, why do you actually store **** about me in your head

seriously man.


You talk about me calling people tards but you wont accept that before I called anyone anything I tried to discuss this and was called conspiracy loon by the others every two posts, how come you dont see that.

Are you completely ****tarded, and you can see why I say that given your completely rose tinted take on how conversations evolve

I have tobes now point blank refusing to discuss it and insists on talking about me, and ou too, and terrific, all three of you are talking about me


Then you wonder why I say little sewing circle or ******s

Honestly I am not even remotely bothered, I am just clearly articulating the ludicrous group behaviour that develops between a few people who may be decent folk but as a forum group, resolve to a shared cretin mentality akin to a schoolyard

 

Do you want to talk about global warming now?

 

Meanwhile the people telling me I am wrong avoid the topic at all costs

 

after last night it's best I dont interact with you. I am not feeding that inner monster of yours.

 

Bullying card played early here...

Any chance of answering my question today mate?

 

When people call you "denier" it feels most rewarding actually, argument of last resort of an ego trying to protect itself