Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Most viruses like to keep the host alive whilst they screw it over though, we seem intent on fecking up this planet.

 

I think you'll find that's not necessarily true...

 

I thought of that clip as soon as i read the post. Viruses are basically just another parasite and most don't do us any harm but there are some clever parasites that that need the host to die so the parasite can then complete its life cycle (dont know about this in any human ones). How on earth did evolution come up with that?

 

It's the flaw in the whole evolution argument

Do you think viruses get a rough ride and perhaps bacteria (not yakult) are the real dangerous fckers? Or at least a ticking time bomb. Now they really DO count on evolution!!

 

Lol, chances are something will wipeout mankind fairly soon (in geological terms). There is probably just as much chance of it being an infection of some kind, be that some man made virus like AIDS that goes wrong or a new strain of an antibiotic resistant infection. especially those we are now catching when we go IN to hospital such as C-diff.

What will get us first, climate change, infection, the LHC or sucked into a black hole?

 

Hospitals are where all the sick and dying go, unless I'm in hospital I won't visit the places!!

 

Really? The rest of us often go there for our holidays

 

I don't want to be catching monkey AIDS.

 

Don't go to a monkey hospital and **** the sick monkeys then

 

Why else would you visit a monkey hospital?

 

To steal towels from the bathrooms, obviously.

 

Global warming.

Btw, death could equally be said to be a flaw in the evolution argument as the virus killing the host one. The idea is the virus lives long enough and spreads enough (and mutates enough) for enough clls to jump to another host and start the process again. That's why viruses can lay dormant for eons in some 'resistant' hosts, just waiting for some of its soldiers to find another host that doesn't have resistance.

 

And Studge.

 

Which is which?

please log in to view this image

 

Yet more smoke and mirrors, as the shape of the graphs intimate that the temperatures are the same, when we both know that the current warming curve is at a higher temperature.

 

Can you tell me which is which?

Instead talk of auld BBF and smoke and mirrors.

 

Which is which? Repost due to bitter spam

please log in to view this image

 

It is smoke an mirrors and you know it.

They're at different temperatures aren't they. The current warming curve is at a higher temperature.

You also know that the current temperature increase comes at a time when solar activity is on the downward curve of it's cycle. So what's causing it?

 

You mean a response that you don't like, as it wasn't the reaction you - nor the denier site you copied and pasted it from - was looking for.

#standard

 

One is claimed to be natural, and one alarmingly fast warming, THAT is why I am asking.

Remember, we are told ipso facto that the current warming since 1950 is anonymous, meaning it must be unusually fast warming.
We are talking what the climate fraudsters claim here, that current warming is unprecedented.

So, one is normal warming, natural, and the other is the unprecedented warming.

So which is the alleged dramatic warming not do to natural causes? Left or right?