Danny please just tell me ?

And why would you just want to know what he was thinking?

 

Forget rating him I am not doing that , what was he thinking ? He slipped afterwards , he headed it downwards back towards the danger area and with no real pace on it , what was he aiming to do ?

 

To see what he what he was trying to do ?

 

Were you actually expecting him to come on here and tell you himself?

 

He should just wait near Nandos or Costa if he does.

 

Of course I was , don't all professional footballers go on their respective clubs every day ?

 

The sarcasm is strong in this one. Well, either you actually were expecting a response from the man himself, or you were just being a passive-aggressive little bitch. Either way, man up and support your team.

 

Passive aggressive , are you kind of sandal wearing hippy who goes to vegan book fairs ?
My aim was to see if the people who come on here , Amin , Gaddafi and Barry Chuckle included have views on what he was actually trying to do and achieve as I have never seen anything like that either watching or playing for over 20 years .

 

Okay, I'm going to need to break this comment down and tackle it piece by piece.

Let's start with this intriguing question:

This question raises further questions:
- How does the term "passive-aggressive" make you think of hippies?
- Are hippies in some way intrinsically opposed to passive-aggressive behavior?
- What is a vegan book fair?

If I would hazard a guess as to how to answer that question, I suppose I would say that I rarely wear sandals and that I eat meat almost on a daily basis. How that answer would help or enlighten you in any way, I'm not sure.

Onto the bulk of your comment:

The part of this which immediately draws my attention is the "Amin, Gaddafi and Barry Chuckle" part. Now, I'm guessing that you are referring to Idi Amin, Muammar Gaddafi and one of the Chuckle Brothers, but I have two very good reasons as to why they probably won't chip in with their views on Danny Fox's mistake yesterday:

- None of them support Southampton, to my knowledge.
- Two of them are dead.

Now, as for the views of the regular posters on this forum, you've already seen a few of them, and my answer will be along the same lines. He made a mistake under pressure, the team had clearly been given instructions to pass it out from the back and keep possession, and this was clearly going through his mind when he tried to keep the ball in instead of conceding a corner.

I have done my best to answer your questions. I hope this is satisfactory.

 

Barry Chuckle supports Rotherham. Happy to help.

 

Source?

 

Ok I need to break that post down but it will take a while , break a comment down ha ha !

 

He likes sauce but supports Rotherham........

 

If you are as your location says in Liverpool it would say a lot. Keep your moronic comments to yourself.

 

Why Liverpool ? Now that is a ridiculous statement .

 

Wo there peeps. Can everyone just chill? The original comment wasn't "moronic" ffs. Maybe it was written in a manner not befitting some of the more refined tastes on here, but get over it for ****'s sake. You know what he was trying to say, so lighten up.

 

Don't drink and type, kids.

 

Yes, sometimes you spill it (and it's hard to lick off the keys).

 

I thought it was a completely valid question , why would you ever head the ball back into play when people would be running onto the ball , for a start the other defenders would be facing the wrong way to make a strong and accurate clearance or a high % of that happening .
If a ball like that cones in you should knock it out of play for a corner or throw in or you leave it to run onto the ball and jockey if it goes to the opposition , again what was he thinking ?
What was he trying to achieve ?

 

Fox should be good cover for Lambert, as shown with his excellent head down for Nasri.