Danny gets...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Michael Oliver proved he isnt as much of a bellend as Jon Moss

Drinkwater apparently told him to **** off and Oliver hasnt included that in his report so Drinky cant be further charged for it
 
Some good news then. The media are making a big deal over Huth but IMO that is a yellow card offence if seen whereas Fellaini should have gone. To ban Huth after the event would say to me that it is purely based on the fact it happened at the same time not for the offence itself. He shouldn't receive a ban surely
 
Getting fed up with the media forcing the
authorities into retro action (unless your name is Wayne with a thatched head). Makes you wonder who is really in charge.
 
Would that be a red card if seen ? **** me lets go through all the prem games this season & 80% of the players would be band for the rest of the season & the start of next (if not got 3 games left).
 
THE FOXES 1884 said:
Would that be a red card if seen ? **** me lets go through all the prem games this season & 80% of the players would be band for the rest of the season & the start of next (if not got 3 games left).
Click to expand...
As I said elsewhere, this is only as it was at the same time. Basically they need to ban Fellaini for his actions and are worried that there will be a backlash from Spurs if Huth isn't banned too. Spurs have a hold over the FA as we saw with them forcing the change of referee for their match
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back