I don't know what the article says beyond what people have quoted. Unlike you, I don't support the Daily Mail by falling for their obvious clickbait and then trying to justify myself by claiming I'm helping bringing the paper down by doing it. Here we go again, incoming five or so posts doing nothing but calling me names lol. Actually, I imagine this is what arguing with a Daily Mail reader is like anyway.
I think it is quite worrying when newspapers start to become Internet Blogs, in other words it doesn't matter about truth or insight, it just matters how many clicks they get. My own view is that is why the BBC becomes more important and why I am so disappointed when McNumpty is just as partisan and ridiculous as the Daily Mail. I would NEVER go to the Daily Mail for news on current affairs, and I am not sure that clicking on football articles does anything to validate them. If they don't exist there will be some other cheap piece of trash writing that sort of stuff, and fans willing to believe it. What I don't like is when Arsenal fans don't have the balls to recognize how stupid it is, and let The Mail impose their opinion, and grind them down. I also object when it is factually incorrect, and they have had to take down a number of articles in the last year or so over factual errors, because of widespread condemnation in the comments section.
