Over the course of the last 10 games Fulham have managed to gain 10 points. This is the worst out of all the teams around us and relegation form.
Bristol City - 10 games - 16 points
MK Dons - 10 games - 13 points
Rotherham 10 games - 11 points (9 of which have been in the last 3 games, admittedly)
In fact, since Slavi became manager 12 games ago (not counting the game against Rotherham where he was a spectator and not actually in charge and the FA cup game) we still only have the 10 points.
Going back 21 games to when Kit was sacked we have picked up a further 7 points
Going back another 14 games to the beginning of the season we managed 20 points (including 2 sets of back to back wins). Basically double the tally Slavi has managed.
The question is then - should we have stuck with Kit? I accept the period without a manager where we only picked up 7 points was reasonably season defining but if we had stuck with Kit we would almost certainly have had more points by now be safe from relegation in mid table, he could have seen out his contract and we could have shopped around for a new manager in the summer (given Slavi was never going to get us up when he came in anyway). We'll probably find there will be as good or better managers knocking around post season than Slavi so we wouldn't have lost anything by waiting - and we may have gained something.
Obviously I'm not saying sack the manager - but if we should go down, with his current win/loss ratio, should it be considered as he doesn't seem to be getting through to the team, his tactics aren't producing results (albeit they are producing better football), he hasn't instilled any steel in the defence, the penalty count has gone through the roof and we don't win back to back games anymore. He talks a good fight and personally I like him but the players don't seem to be responding - we didn't even get the new manager bounce.
Bristol City - 10 games - 16 points
MK Dons - 10 games - 13 points
Rotherham 10 games - 11 points (9 of which have been in the last 3 games, admittedly)
In fact, since Slavi became manager 12 games ago (not counting the game against Rotherham where he was a spectator and not actually in charge and the FA cup game) we still only have the 10 points.
Going back 21 games to when Kit was sacked we have picked up a further 7 points
Going back another 14 games to the beginning of the season we managed 20 points (including 2 sets of back to back wins). Basically double the tally Slavi has managed.
The question is then - should we have stuck with Kit? I accept the period without a manager where we only picked up 7 points was reasonably season defining but if we had stuck with Kit we would almost certainly have had more points by now be safe from relegation in mid table, he could have seen out his contract and we could have shopped around for a new manager in the summer (given Slavi was never going to get us up when he came in anyway). We'll probably find there will be as good or better managers knocking around post season than Slavi so we wouldn't have lost anything by waiting - and we may have gained something.
Obviously I'm not saying sack the manager - but if we should go down, with his current win/loss ratio, should it be considered as he doesn't seem to be getting through to the team, his tactics aren't producing results (albeit they are producing better football), he hasn't instilled any steel in the defence, the penalty count has gone through the roof and we don't win back to back games anymore. He talks a good fight and personally I like him but the players don't seem to be responding - we didn't even get the new manager bounce.