How often do we here comments made by football pundits and managers alike as well as we football supporters about crossing the ball from the wing (meaning a cross in the air) ????, pretty regularly I would suggest. Poor cross, over hit cross, under hit cross, far post cross, near post cross etc etc. This is all well and good but even the best high cross from the wing is relying on a team mate getting on the end of it, and one who is good in the air as well.
When recognised wide players (as wingers have now been christened) provides a high cross from the wing it should be a good cross as that is part of his repertoire, but he is still relying on someone geting on the end of it to make the cross count. We also now have what is known as wing fullbacks, who are expected to have a duel role as the name wing fullback suggests.
Have managers, coaches, pundits etc, forgotten that the most dangerous pass in football is a pass played along the floor back from the goal line. This pass is the most difficult for defenders to deal with as usually they are facing their own goal, and invariably when used it is successful and ends with a goal.
The difficulty is that that the provider must have the ability to get to the goal line before making the pass, which usualy includes having to beat an apposing player first.
IMHO very few wing backs have this ability and end up having to cross the ball in the air, which tends to be a hit and hope ball. Even when it's a good high cross defenders are favourites to get the ball as they now have their back to their goal.
In modern day football this ability to beat a player get to the goal line and make a good pass along the ground back from the goal line, seems to have disappeared except for the Prem league. In fact the ability to beat a player by skillful means seems to be a dying art in our game.
Tactics are being used more and more as THE way to beat the opposition, is this because most modern day players cant beat an opponent OR the manager/coach tells them to get rid of the ball. You can see this in all it's glory at junior level were the youngsters are berated by the manager for holding on to the ball.
I have to admit that there is no simple and easy answer to this problem (if there is a problem), but I have to admit that I get a bit fed up of seeing teams on the attack and ending up with an aimless high ball into the middle (or worse) that comes to nought except for allowing the defending team to go on the offensive.
Has anyone any thoughts on the above comments. Agree/disagree doesn't matter at all but the site is quiet and could do with some debate.

When recognised wide players (as wingers have now been christened) provides a high cross from the wing it should be a good cross as that is part of his repertoire, but he is still relying on someone geting on the end of it to make the cross count. We also now have what is known as wing fullbacks, who are expected to have a duel role as the name wing fullback suggests.
Have managers, coaches, pundits etc, forgotten that the most dangerous pass in football is a pass played along the floor back from the goal line. This pass is the most difficult for defenders to deal with as usually they are facing their own goal, and invariably when used it is successful and ends with a goal.
The difficulty is that that the provider must have the ability to get to the goal line before making the pass, which usualy includes having to beat an apposing player first.
IMHO very few wing backs have this ability and end up having to cross the ball in the air, which tends to be a hit and hope ball. Even when it's a good high cross defenders are favourites to get the ball as they now have their back to their goal.
In modern day football this ability to beat a player get to the goal line and make a good pass along the ground back from the goal line, seems to have disappeared except for the Prem league. In fact the ability to beat a player by skillful means seems to be a dying art in our game.
Tactics are being used more and more as THE way to beat the opposition, is this because most modern day players cant beat an opponent OR the manager/coach tells them to get rid of the ball. You can see this in all it's glory at junior level were the youngsters are berated by the manager for holding on to the ball.
I have to admit that there is no simple and easy answer to this problem (if there is a problem), but I have to admit that I get a bit fed up of seeing teams on the attack and ending up with an aimless high ball into the middle (or worse) that comes to nought except for allowing the defending team to go on the offensive.
Has anyone any thoughts on the above comments. Agree/disagree doesn't matter at all but the site is quiet and could do with some debate.
