Crime - part deux.
- Thread starter Sucky
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Fuxk that 
that bear after some human meat for real
that bear after some human meat for real
You must log in or register to see media
Well he got what he wantedYou must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see images
Dayum, man has zero chill for thieves
You must log in or register to see media
shop keeper deserves a bullet to the head
Fuxk that
You must log in or register to see media
I want to know what happens next? It's like reading an Agatha Christie novel and they're all gathered in the library to announce whodunit and the last few pages are missing.
Did the bear get a nice snack, or did the snack get away?
It's a sad world when people are getting done for cartoons. My WhatsApp is always seeing things like this.
That's weird... And disturbing... But...is it really illegal? I guess it depends if the image is more geared towards humour/satire or porn.
Surely it's more appropriate to point at the lad and say "haha" than it is to charge them with a crime.
Don't know how any of it started but just looking at that clip, riot vans need to go in.
The absolute state of the British public
The whole thing is a mess. Bunch of nobheads screaming and shouting over fck all playing the victim, and a bunch of keystone cops who couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag. Embarrassing all round.
Tbf the cops are not allowed to use any degree of force because ****ers be filming them on phones.
I was just listening to the sentencing of a young man for having extremist material on his phone, and for allegedly attempting to plan an attack. He got life but with a minimum period of six years before he can ever be reviewed by a parole board and he will remain on licence for the rest of his life. I don't know if he did anything else wrong, but fooking hell, the courts aint messing about with them. I think it was his mum that grassed him up as well.
Not messing about with some I'd say.
For this dickhead life sentence in prison with possibility of parole after 6 years. I've no problem with throwing the book at him.
But then you have another sentenced 3 weeks ago who was much further down the line. Similar rhetoric about wanting to kill people but he'd built homemade explosives and a gun ffs. 8 year sentence served in a young offender's institute with possibility of parole after 5 years.
One is a muslim extremist and the other a far-right one. Just sends out the wrong message. Hammer both I don't care, but as it is seems a bit fcked up to me.
Surely a young offenders institute then will be based on his age?
You got a link to the other story?
This is the one I was chatting about...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/06/02/teen...tenced-over-attempted-terror-attack-18886553/
https://uk.style.yahoo.com/british-teen-jailed-over-imminent-121157881.html
Last edited:
The bloke you've posted about was a year younger so don't see how it's to do with age.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-65559610
Hmm, strange, it has as far as I'm aware always been about age, deciding where you get put, ie a prison or what I use to know as Borstal - I checked my previous understanding on the latter, and both fall within that age group 16 years - 21 years.
So I don't know now how the deciding factor comes about.
In case you are wondering why I call it Borstal it's because it's where they used to be housed in Rochester, Kent. So I don't know if that is a general name or just a local one.