...nor the people telling it ... which is why he should have burnt it in his garden ... nobody calls him a **** then ...
I wouldn’t be happy if someone burned one of the Jewish books I’ve not read on the high street. I wouldn’t stab them as I don’t regularly carry my bread knife when I’m out and about not cutting bread and also I’m not mental but I don’t think I’d say to myself ‘don’t like it but it’s freedom of speech’ and carry on my day. Essentially, the bloke wanted a reaction and he got one. The stabby bloke has still obviously committed a crime and should get a long stretch for it.
I'm going to guess, and that is all it is an assumption on my part...I realised eventually yesterday it was outside the Turkish Consulate, so I'm thinking it was a message of some sort to those within the consulate for whatever reason. I wonder if under International law we are duty bound to protect the consulate against harrassment, although the ground outside would come under domestic law.
I had a meeting close to a few embassies on a sunny morning late last year so had a little potter about. Only the Turkish embassy had armed guards outside. If I was looking to peacefully protest against Islam it’s probably not the one I’d **** about outside.
I don't totally agree with this although I understand your point. I heard the German Chancellor saying about deporting the stabby guy the other day, my problem with that is, shouldn't we be locking them up? Surely the guy is going to be doing a very long stretch, to even see daylight again. I agree we need an approach to this such as you suggest, but I just can't see a practical one at the moment?
If you shoot and kill everyone you’ll find crime goes down to zero. We’ll have to bring in shooters to shoot the shooters but we can deal with any issues as they come.
Bit traumatic for the bloke shooting maybe. As much as I’m anti-capital punishment I quite like the firing squad idea where only one shooter has a live round and none of them know who it is.
... the problem there is that it then becomes 'our' cost - would rather see us offer preferential trading agreements to those countries that are open to taking their home born scrotes off our hands - added bonus is that the punishment in the foreign prison is much more likely to fit the crime
I’m not sure on that one. I’d doubt it actually that we are duty bound but we probably do give them favourable treatment compared to other places of work.
Again I'd agree with you Fosse, but can't see what agreements we could draw up with countries like Afghanistan, but otherwise yeah would make perfect sense. The added bonus of the punishment likely to fit the crime, I suppose we could just strap a parachute to them and push them out over the location, and wish them goodluck lol.
... that would do it ... ... wasn't suggesting I had a perfect solution by any means ... but it appalls me that British taxpayers might have to fund the long term well being of individuals that have no respect for our country and its laws...
Sadly mate we took the ****s in so now we pay the price for that. I always said if you took people from some of these war torn countries, that would have witnessed or have been party to atrocities. you take the problems that psychologically come with them, but daring to suggest that or to give them the specialised care they required was regarded as racist. We can't even care for our own mentally ill, and the cost of of dealing with these issues is enormous. We allowed it to happen so now we have to suck it up and deal with it, I'm afraid the German Chancellors thoughts of deporting them is no longer an option or I'd certainly take some convincing otherwise. I completely disagreed with us scrubbing our hands of the Begum girl, especially when there is a lot worse guys out there in Europe, hey ho but what the **** do I know...not a go at you by the way.
