I couldn’t find anything in there or anywhere online about Starmer representing him. I’m not sure the dates add up for that to happen, mate.
Oooh a conspiracy theory - love'em ... only problem is they more often turn out to be nothing more than the 'wishful thinking' of those with a bit of an agenda... https://tribune.com.pk/story/251040...tarmer-representing-southport-suspects-father
I've just checked, and It's not there now, but Starmer did represent his dad to stay in England, I read it but didn't keep it ,in one article there is a picture of his dad surrounded by skulls at his feet, and it told the story of how his dad invaded Rwanda from a neighbouring country.Its hard to find anything about that family now , but Starmer lied about Southport and saying it wasn't a terrorist attack, when he dam well knew it was, and only releasing pictures of a schoolboy and not the madman we now see. He also said Jimmy Saville never came across his desk when leader of the CPS, Starmers got form for lying and covering up. Anyway I'm off searching someone must have the details that haven't been taken down
I've read your piece of crap, the debunked info source came direct from Queer Starmers office, and we all know how many lies they tell 1/ they said it wasn't terrorist related when it was 2/ they published pics of a school boy instead of the mad man 3/ they squashed all of the information on it with threatened prosecution 4/They forced him to plead guilty so all the truth wouldn't come out 5/ they said he didn't represent Rwandans, he came from another country as an invader of course they won't find him as a Rwandan 6/ There was no mention of the three other times he was sent to specialists for terrorist tendencies 7/ tried to cover up the taxi incident when he tried to go to another school with knifes Do you remember what Starmer told everyone when the terrorist was arrested or is it the usual Labour memory loss[/QUOTE]
Really? ... well cut me brain out and call me Wodger ... The reason it's been taken down Wodge is because it's bollocks and potentially libellous...
Do you think The Mail ffs! Is a get out of jail card, no it isn't, use what brain cells you have and answer the questions raised,about his lies if you can, you know Starmer lies
well you mean like Starmer saying its not terrorist related when they knew all along it was. Its only bollocks because your mind wants it to be.your hero has been found out and his card is marked, He will try and hang on till he takes us back into Europe so he can get the cushy job promised like Rutte the ex PM from the Netherlands, it was because of that lefty twat i moved from the Netherlands
Wodge - you telling me to use my brain is rather like Oscar Pistorious telling me to use my legs ... 'Starmers office' would not be issuing a denial on something already in the public domain and wholly transparent... The Mail Online is as politically unbiased as Atilla The Hun at a Proud Boys rally
Have you actually read the judgement Wodge? ... just out of interest? If so, please enlighten me as to which prescribed terrorist group Axel Rudubakana was part of?
taken directly from the link you provided A spokesperson for the Prime Minister firmly denied the claims, stating that there is no basis for the accusation ill await your apology, the denial in the article you posted was direct from your Liar in chief
You'll be waiting a long time - that just proves my point you dufus - Starmer never represented Axel Radubakana's father - the Twitter claims have been debunked - read the article ...
I'ts OK mate - neither does Wodge In a nutshell (quite apt), Wodge claims that Starmer once defended the Southport killer's father... coz he read it in The Mail Online and possibly from some Twatter conspiracy theorists .. Starmer's office have rubbished the claims - the article I posted Wodge believes Starmer's office are lying - despite the fact that the information / details will already be in the public domain and that it would be political suicide for the PM to do so knowing the denial to be untrue ... There you go.
what a dope you are, the debunk came from Starmer HIMSELF he knows he fekked up and wants it burying, You are so radical left you would have difficulty lying straight in bed WAW
