Depends on how many Muslims are on the jury I guessGood. They’ll get a bigger sentence.
Magistrates can only sentence people to one year maximum, unless that’s changed?

Depends on how many Muslims are on the jury I guessGood. They’ll get a bigger sentence.
Magistrates can only sentence people to one year maximum, unless that’s changed?

Which is?Probably the same reason that the authorities waited so long to charge them…
The same reason they covered up the grooming gangsWhich is?

To keep the Muslim votes?The same reason they covered up the grooming gangs![]()
To stop them kicking off. They’re scared of upsetting communities. (The authorities words, not mine)To keep the Muslim votes?
Ain't that the truth.To stop them kicking off. They’re scared of upsetting communities. (The authorities words, not mine)
100%Ain't that the truth.
Fakhts100%
If you remember Sucky, when it happened (before the full video was released) the Muslim community was up in arms because they believed this was a racist attack by police officers on Muslims just minding their own business in an airport.
I truly believe and said at the time that the police wouldn’t do anything for a long time to allow the tensions to die down because by charging them straightaway they’d have been worried about another kick off and that’s what happened.
What I do know, is if me and you battered a few cops in an airport like that, we’d have been locked up, charged, court the next day and remanded until trial. They wouldn’t have worried about anyone we know kicking off.
Again, this is the authorities to blame. They’re the ones making these ludicrous calls.

cos the prisons are fullPretty much yeh mate.
Dunno why they ain't on remand tho
Yeh not full of ****s tho.cos the prisons are full
you don't even know what *****phile means .Yeh not full of ****s tho.
Thats basically legal now
Go on tell me.you don't even know what *****phile means .
i did years ago but just to remind youGo on tell me.
Congratulations hewi did years ago but just to remind you
a *****phile is someone whose sole or primary sexual attraction is to pre pubescent children
You tell me.thanks
what did i win ?
no idea since i have no idea who he is or what he wad charged with .You must log in or register to see media
Is this a **** solid?
Sexual abuse images of children.no idea since i have no idea who he is or what he wad charged with .
doesn't necessary make him a *****phile but does make him a vile **** who should be locked upSexual abuse images of children.
Judge let him off a custodial because he's a pillar of the community.
Like hew