I didn't create the scenario mate, I've already given you another way of handling it. If you are going to box people in, make sure it's a box they can't get out of, without having to get jittery on a trigger.
he would be alive if he had just stopped put his hands in the air . think we aint going to agree on this so i'm going to concentrate on Dortmund battering Real
In your little perfect world yeah, but criminals don't do that when behind the wheel of a car, in fact I'd say it's unusual for a suspect to stop and put his hands up, so you know what's going to happen, and as I said previously on here, he wouldn't have expected a bullet and nor would I. So these are the new deploy tactics in the UK, head shot if you try and run.
I'm sure I heard something from the trial where they were asked if they said stop armed police or words to that affect, it was assumed that the suspect never heard that with all the commotion. They don't remember saying it either but stated they are trained to say it all the time.
67 have been around for years in south. kabbas lot are just the next age group to be killed, jailed, nothings stopped that..already the youngers have stepped in trust blud Anyways
I've posted this on GC, so I'll post it here just the same.... Can I ask you a question.... I hear what you are saying and I am hearing what other people are saying that a copper could have died with him ramming the block, I disagree with this take but I'll accept it. So the question, when the rioters were terrorising people by smashing up their homes and cars, whether be left, right, white, black, muslim, christian, when the rioters were attempting to burn down a hotel with migrants assumed inside, when coppers were cornered and being battered by a baying mod, some hospitalised, why didn't we shoot them? I know of the two scenarios which one would have scared me more, yet we treated it differently, with a different approach, regardless of some receiving long sentences later, people's lives were at threat just the same.
Simples Kier had all the rioters jailed so that the Justice Minister could say the Prisons are dangerously overcrowded and they were forced to release hundreds of dangerous maniacs loose on the public because of all the Black Holes left by the previous Government
I wouldn't have been opposed for the really nasty elements (is this the dictator in me?) but the thing between the riots and this gangster is that those rioters were all caught up in a flame of emotions and acting of impulse, anger and conformity. Yes what they did was wrong but would they still be acting like that as a general lifestyle The realistic chance of them deliberately killing a copper as well was lower. This guy who tried to get away was a highly wanted criminal who led a life of crime, would have continued to lead a life of violent crime. To go to an extreme example, is anyone up on arms when bin laden was shot rather than sending in dianne abbott to give him a hug and asking him back to prison. Probably not. The only part of the nuance in all this is that they did not know who was in the car so didnt have his profile but if hes boxed in and hes still ramming cars **** him. Heard the copper has a bounty on his head now and has had to go into hiding.
Yeah I'm with you Bobby, fook him. Sometimes I just play devils advocate, I find the responses interesting.
This investigation has been reopened, after the police closed the case originally due to medical reasons of the driver involved. The families want this medical background throughly investigated, so not sure if new things have come to light. https://news.sky.com/story/met-poli...that-killed-two-eight-year-old-girls-13240141
Yeah ... saw that ... rightly so ... presumably they've already ruled out her being on her phone etc. mind ?
I got the impression and I could be wrong, that they seem to think her medical history wasn't investigated fully enough. The driver had an epileptic fit behind the wheel, so I make assumptions on maybe questions around how long this has been known, what does medical history show, what's been known outside of medical history, bit like what have people said on social meida, I'm just trying to think the type of things, none of this has actually been said. I suppose it's like when I ended up a Spanish hospital many years ago, before the travel insurance would authorise any non emergency medical care, they needed all my files from my doctor, to see if there was history that I hadn't disclosed at the time of taking out the insurance....cost them absolute thousands So glad I didn't travel without cover.
Sometimes it can backfire on me, I play devils advocate and because I get in it too deep, I then won't let go. but it is interesting getting other people's thoughts on things. I've known @Welshie to do that a few times...lays bait and waits for the bites lol.
