I'm just wondering if this stare was on the first day. Fair enough if they're guilty but imagine if they'd been innocent
Didn't get to trial this was where we were sworn in, there was no doubt about their guilt it showed in their faces and demeanour and the evidence we were warned about must have been horrific
They looked shifty Bet it weren't cancelled after pleading guilty either. Probably a mistrial after Duggie's Death Stare.
Saw that today on twitter. I love it when people respond to that account in outrage sometimes, not knowing it's a parody.
What the fk is this fella fking wearing be fkd……the kings marker What the fk is going on with this German nonsense thing in Britain hey ….what an incredible load of silly sh,it we gotta pay for init https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66317374
Was refused release after 7 years cos he refused to admit his guilt... thought that they did away with that rule after the injustices that came to light in the 1980s and 90s.
Life to be served as a category A prisoner, which will be served at Belmarsh, tried to get off wih MH (correction: claimed autistic melt down), well that worked out well for him. Story not released yet, but it's to do with this... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-66319779
Yeah I thought the same Bobby, tried to be a clever shhite, backfired on him and ended up killing a cop, nigh blowing his own brains out in the process, dumbfuck, then thought he could play the autistic card - I could tell the judge was loving it when he was specifically laying it out for him, you will be in Category A, you will be going Belmarsh, you will be getting all your medical needs and drugs there, and you will be serving life. It only left for him to put on the black cap, and the rope would have been out.
Mr Malkinson - who was cleared of a rape he did not commit by the Court of Appeal on Wednesday - explained the rules which govern any financial claim he has to make. "Even if you fight tooth and nail and gain compensation, you have to pay the Prison Service for so-called 'board and lodging'," said Andrew Malkinson, after his first night as an innocent man. The rules were originally imposed by judges in the case of men wrongly convicted of the murder of paperboy Carl Bridgewater in 1978. "It's kind of sick," said Mr Malkinson, who served 17 years in prison before eventually being released in 2020. The rules date back to a decision made in 2007 by the House of Lords, when it was the UK's highest court. Cousins Vincent and Michael Hickey, two of those convicted of the murder of Carl Bridgewater. Their convictions were found to be fundamentally flawed in 1997, and the then home secretary Jack Straw decided that they and their co-defendant James Robinson were entitled to compensation. Michael Hickey was awarded £1.02m and Vincent Hickey received £550,000 but, in each case, a 25% deduction was made from the section of their compensation which reflected their loss of earnings while in prison. This was because of the living expenses they had not had to fund while in prison. The men appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) but the court ruled in favour of the law lords' decision. Michael O'Brien spent 11 years in prison before his conviction for murder was overturned. "I remember my solicitor phoning me up, and she said, 'They're going to charge you bed and board'. "What's the logic in this? They don't charge guilty people, they only charge innocent people. "It was the final insult, as far as I was concerned, to an innocent man."
Twitter clip of the crime, then SKY show the video of him being followed by a police drone, and trying to look for stones to throw at it...
