Yeah, why did he deliberately get him out off a no-ball? What a ****.
I wasn't watching, but by all accounts Stokes bowled a fine spell this evening - 2 for 33 off 15 overs while Archer was off the field. He's also currently our best batsman (not saying much, admittedly). You're going to have to get over your Stokes hatred Col, because he will be our next captain. Actually, that's not quite right, is it? You seem to enjoy England losing, so having Stokes as captain would top it off for you wouldn't it? You could moan yourself stupid.
Enjoy England losing?
**** off!
No one could ever accuse me of not being behind England.
**** me, I'd passionately cheer them on at tiddlywinks!
No, the fact is I'm realistic and you're a blind optimist.
Yes, Stokes bowled s fantastic spell at the end of the day and has a huge heart and loads of ability.
Nevertheless, imo, he's too expensive at times and doesn't seem to me to have that magic touch like say Botham who was also expensive, but would take wickets just when required quite often.
Stokes will no doubt continue to prove me wrong on lots of occasions and I'll be thrilled.
His batting gets better and better, although the shot he got out to yesterday was about as brain dead as is possible to be.
And that's my biggest problem with him.
He's thick and it shows.
He isn't captain material imo.
Also, we shouldn't keep making our form players captain. Look at Root!! His form has evaporated and he's not a great captain either.
We used to have a good test side who were crap at white ball cricket.
We've concentrated on the latter and become world champions.
Maybe now we'll have to flip that around again to become competitive in tests.
Plus this year's schedule has been purely aimed at one day cricket and our players haven't had the chance to adjust.
Just for you, I'll end on a positive note.
If England are chasing under 330, I reckon they'll have an outside chance by going into full one day mode and hoping for the best.
That's where their strengths are after all.