There should be a moratorium on any life-saving medicine until the population drops to about 15-20% of what it is now, unless they can cure starvation.
When I die, **** it I wanna go to hell 'Cause I'm a piece of ****, it ain't hard to ****in' tell It don't make sense, goin' to heaven with the goodie-goodies Dressed in white, I like black Timbs and black hoodies God'll probably have me on some real strict **** No sleepin' all day, no getting my dick licked Hangin' with the goodie-goodies loungin' in paradise **** that ****, I wanna tote guns and shoot dice Biggie Smalls The illist
We eat each other.... ... But there's a long way to go before that happens. Africa alone has enough arable land to feed 12 billion people with current technology.... Foodwise we can grow our population a lot more. It might not be pleasant, but we could.
we're ****ed soon anyway. Anti-biotics are failing and if they don't work you lose the ability to operate on people. people will be dying of any old **** with nothing to fight infections with...
I went to a talk by this guy a few years back. He thinks the first person to live forever might already be alive. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey
I don't see the point in achieving immortality. Surely the world would just become over populated, what's the point - we are meant to die, evolution. It might serve a purpose in space exploration in the future once the technology has the capabilities to allow humans to travel further for longer but that's along way off (in bringing them back as well).
Check out seawater greenhouses and vertical farming too. But for a for a few greedy motherfuckers, we could easily feed, clothe, provide housing, clean water, power and communications for everyone in the world. These things should be basic human rights for everyone (and should be achievable), like breathing air.
The Earth is due to be consumed by the Sun in about 7.5b years, but I suppose the hope is by then that humankind (if we're still around) will have colonised other planets. Who knows what humans might look like then anyway, we may have evolved into completely different beings capable of inter dimensional travel etc. The problem with living forever is that you'd have so many children, grand children, great grandchildren etc, that Christmas and birthdays would be a nightmare. Can you imagine it ? It's Christmas 5000 years from now, and you've got to buy presents for 16,000 people.
Every cell in the human body replaces itself in a 7 year cycle, so in reality there’s not a cell in your body that’s older than 7. So I’ve always thought if you could figure out why cells ‘age’ during the reproductive process you could halt the ageing process, but I suppose it’s at what point you’d have to intervene to stop it happening. A society of eternal 6 month olds might be an issue like.
After reading this Fred I'm off to top myself. Who's with me? Fan mate, let's do this shìt. Your life is over anyway.
You only quoted the first part of my post (which i've bolded). The point was in the second part of my comment, which is the answer to your response. It's one reason i've never objected to space exploration, it seems pointless at times now, although lots of technical advancements have evolved from it, but in the distant future, if humans are not to follow the same fate as the dinosaurs, then we would need to find another planet to inhabit, but even finding another planet may not save us if the universe implodes, it's just our destiny to die bro. It's a bit like Fosse's ferret, everything eventually shrivels up and dies even if he pontificates he could still somehow sell a Norwegian Blue to women.
