Using real data. I mean, I'm not a rocket scientist, but if I use real data to make my estimate on Covid deaths and you use absolutely zero data to make stupid claims on vaccine deaths, who is likely to be the most reliable? Me with actual data, or you with Facebook and an anecdote?
I mean this is literally a pro for my argument, not yours. If we're delaying operations and treatment, then the best way to stop that is to get the vaccine. You're absolutely right, it will be an enormous impact. It's people like YOU that are meaning we have to delay treatments. No vaccine = more spread = less treatment that we can conduct. Don't give me that rubbish about caring about those who are ill if you're willingly part of the problem.
Only 200 years of scientific research and development on vaccines. Including ones that every single person in this forum will almost certainly have taken to no negative effect. What have you got?
This is literally you:
You must log in or register to see images
The one time you use an actual stat and you use it incorrectly! You're either cherry picking a winter there (which of course is going to be comparatively higher than a calendar year) or using 2 years. And even with that cherry picking, you're STILL miles behind the Covid figures.
The real stats:
2018 UK excess deaths - 20,869
2020 UK excess deaths - ~79,000
- (in fact it passed 100,000 just a month later)
2020 UK Covid deaths - 77,195
Isn't it magic how the UK excess deaths and Covid deaths are very similar? Or maybe it's just a massive coincidence!
Regardless, no years come even close to 2020. If you plot calendar year excess deaths then 2020 sticks out by a mile and 2021 continues exactly the same.
You are utterly wrong. You have no stats to back up any of your claims, absolutely nothing at all, and your claims are actually dangerous. I just genuinely hope for your sake that you're not unlucky enough to catch it with no protection, and not stupid enough to try Invermectin or anything like that to 'treat' yourself.