Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...

  • should completely lock us down immediately and fook up all our Christmas'

    Votes: 3 12.5%

  • let the bodies stack high

    Votes: 13 54.2%

  • lock us down from the 29th to fook up Treble's plans

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
aberdude said:
Everyone can see from the full interview people walked before he even started with his rightful place to free speech

also stats can be manipulated and evidence can be placed under the secrets act hidden from public view

Real people are the reason this MP is in place In the first place and real people have reached out to him for a voice who have real issues from this vaccine now these people are not like me they clearly were ok with vaccine so received it in trust that it was just a sore arm and maybe a slight fever as they were told


Total respect for this man standing up for the very people that he is supposed to his pays masters the public and not that of big pharmaceutical corporations deep pockets or any other cabals of industry

Him or fking Matt Hancock hey I wonder who I trust ffs
Click to expand...
I'd go with trust neither .
Both are lying twats and just because one is pushing a narrative that you support doesn't make him right .
Both are in it for the money .
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee, Peej and Big Ern
This is what Bridgen has done, said it’s the vaccine, then called for it to be stopped until problem it isn’t. Where is all the anti vaxx evidence that it’s the biggest public health crime of all time? Just pop that up and then hey presto. But even Malhotra hasn’t managed yet.

You must log in or register to see images
 
People walking out….


You must log in or register to see media

Hardly a full house when he started
 
Peej said:
People walking out….


You must log in or register to see media

Hardly a full house when he started
Click to expand...

I don't know what to believe anymore, but the only thing I would say is that the 641 MP's that walked out are there to represent their constiuents. To walk out says they must think they know all the answers, or at least have studied the points that Bridgen is making.

If they don't know all the answers or have not studied his points, what effort have they made to at least know what Bridgen is claiming. There is clearly concerns among the public, all I'd say is let's not forget the Primodos scandal that was denied time and time again for decades.

In fact bullying and silencing campaigners, I just hope we don't see history repeating itself, because by the time any truths come out, most of us on here would have died at the very least from old age.

I've got no time for cranks, but at least listen to their arguments is all I say, because reality will demonstrate in time, even for the ones you dismissed, there will always be side effects on someone (law of averages), when a drug is administered in such huge quantities.

https://news.sky.com/story/primodos...g-disabled-campaigners-in-the-courts-12635728
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock, luvgonzo and aberdude
brb said:
I don't know what to believe anymore, but the only thing I would say is that the 641 MP's that walked out are there to represent their constiuents. To walk out says they must think they know all the answers, or at least have studied the points that Bridgen is making.

If they don't know all the answers or have not studied his points, what effort have they made to at least know what Bridgen is claiming. There is clearly concerns among the public, all I'd say is let's not forget the Primodos scandal that was denied time and time again for decades.

In fact bullying and silencing campaigners, I just hope we don't see history repeating itself, because by the time any truths come out, most of us on here would have died at the very least from old age.

I've got no time for cranks, but at least listen to their arguments is all I say, because reality will demonstrate in time, even for the ones you dismissed, there will always be side effects on someone (law of averages), when a drug is administered in such huge quantities.

https://news.sky.com/story/primodos...g-disabled-campaigners-in-the-courts-12635728
Click to expand...

Primodos scandal was a disgrace. The way those affected were treated was shameful. What I never understood is how the fck can you withdraw a drug bcos it could potentially cause deformaty yet also claim there was no correlation between the drug and babies being damaged. At one point they even had a warning on the box stating it may cause physical abnormalities! And there's evidence of a cover up in the 70's showing that it did cause those deformaties. I haven't looked to see if it's been 'proven' now so I may not be up to speed with it.

I've listened to the speech by Bridgen in full to see what he had to say. Tbh there's not much evidence from him to show what he's claiming. Using the broad description of significant risk as ranging from 'an extended stay in hospital' to 'death' and then extrapolating it as a theory to apply to those who had a booster in January is just supposition not actual figures.

It needs to be broken down further so we can see how many have died as a result, how many have had serious side effects. And separate them from those who've had to stay a few days extra in hospital. And also how much of that applied to the original vaccine jabs and how much applies to the boosters. IF after that the ratios for death and serious side effects are high there's good weight of evidence behind it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo, BobbyD, Peej and 1 other person
Treble said:
Primodos scandal was a disgrace. The way those affected were treated was shameful. What I never understood is how the fck can you withdraw a drug bcos it could potentially cause deformaty yet also claim there was no correlation between the drug and babies being damaged. At one point they even had a warning on the box stating it may cause physical abnormalities! And there's evidence of a cover up in the 70's showing that it did cause those deformaties. I haven't looked to see if it's been 'proven' now so I may not be up to speed with it.

I've listened to the speech by Bridgen in full to see what he had to say. Tbh there's not much evidence from him to show what he's claiming. Using the broad description of significant risk as ranging from 'an extended stay in hospital' to 'death' and then extrapolating it as a theory to apply to those who had a booster in January is just supposition not actual figures.

It needs to be broken down further so we can see how many have died as a result, how many have had serious side effects. And separate them from those who've had to stay a few days extra in hospital. And also how much of that applied to the original vaccine jabs and how much applies to the boosters. IF after that the ratios for death and serious side effects are high there's good weight of evidence behind it.
Click to expand...

I don't even listen to half this stuff anymore, but if I had to make a personal gut instinct judgement, right now, it would say let's at least listen to what's being said in this case (I'm not saying you are not btw) - because at the moment I'm not one hundred percent comfortable with it, and some minor little alarm bells are ringing in the back of my head, well it's either that or my carer telling me it's bedtime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aberdude, Treble and luvgonzo
brb said:
I don't even listen to half this stuff anymore, but if I had to make a personal gut instinct judgement, right now, it would say let's at least listen to what's being said in this case (I'm not saying you are not btw) - because at the moment I'm not one hundred percent comfortable with it, and some minor little alarm bells are ringing in the back of my head, well it's either that or my carer telling me it's bedtime.
Click to expand...

I'm the same mate, I've said before I know of ppl who have had raised blood pressure, and eyesight and hearing issues develop. In one instance an ophthalmic consultant told a relative that they've seen a spike in some condition (can't remember exact details) following the booster. It's only anecdotal but worth investigating. Like you said if something is there it'll probably not come out for a decade or two!

The only thing is, I see it as the result of **** ups rather than anything deliberate, but that's just me. That doesn't mean they won't try to cover it up. They cover up more fck ups than anything else, and that's what they'll probably do here. And the reason is always the same, to stop the lawsuits and to protect the companies behind the fck ups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo, aberdude and brb
Treble said:
I'm the same mate, I've said before I know of ppl who have had raised blood pressure, and eyesight and hearing issues develop. In one instance an ophthalmic consultant told a relative that they've seen a spike in some condition (can't remember exact details) following the booster. It's only anecdotal but worth investigating. Like you said if something is there it'll probably not come out for a decade or two!

The only thing is, I see it as the result of **** ups rather than anything deliberate, but that's just me. That doesn't mean they won't try to cover it up. They cover up more fck ups than anything else, and that's what they'll probably do here. And the reason is always the same, to stop the lawsuits and to protect the companies behind the fck ups.
Click to expand...

well peej reckons fk alls happening that can be attributed to the vaccines so all’s fine in cloud cuckoo land I guess <laugh>
 
brb said:
I don't know what to believe anymore, but the only thing I would say is that the 641 MP's that walked out are there to represent their constiuents. To walk out says they must think they know all the answers, or at least have studied the points that Bridgen is making.

If they don't know all the answers or have not studied his points, what effort have they made to at least know what Bridgen is claiming. There is clearly concerns among the public, all I'd say is let's not forget the Primodos scandal that was denied time and time again for decades.

In fact bullying and silencing campaigners, I just hope we don't see history repeating itself, because by the time any truths come out, most of us on here would have died at the very least from old age.

I've got no time for cranks, but at least listen to their arguments is all I say, because reality will demonstrate in time, even for the ones you dismissed, there will always be side effects on someone (law of averages), when a drug is administered in such huge quantities.

https://news.sky.com/story/primodos...g-disabled-campaigners-in-the-courts-12635728
Click to expand...

spot on dude

every mp who walked out should be suspended and the seat put up for re election pronto

people have had enough of this game surely
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Peej said:
People walking out….


You must log in or register to see media

Hardly a full house when he started
Click to expand...

you do know they are letting people down like yourself that took vaccine and now have life changing consequences and death don’t you

yep these people who Andrew speaks about have more in common with you than they do with me being anti Covid vax and you would think he would have your support instead of your ignorance is bliss approach to something you don’t wanna hear

like I’ve said before none of this effects me because I’ve not had one injection but I do still have empathy for them that have followed orders by trusting in process
 
Unless you look into the actual reasons, she was diagnosed with a hole in heart condition in 2014.
 
4 people I know died over the weekend sepsis and meningitis cause of death

Pfizer/biotech vaccine has been attributed to this problem over the last year and a half but don’t worry it’s still rare……so they say
 
Treble said:
Primodos scandal was a disgrace. The way those affected were treated was shameful. What I never understood is how the fck can you withdraw a drug bcos it could potentially cause deformaty yet also claim there was no correlation between the drug and babies being damaged. At one point they even had a warning on the box stating it may cause physical abnormalities! And there's evidence of a cover up in the 70's showing that it did cause those deformaties. I haven't looked to see if it's been 'proven' now so I may not be up to speed with it.

I've listened to the speech by Bridgen in full to see what he had to say. Tbh there's not much evidence from him to show what he's claiming. Using the broad description of significant risk as ranging from 'an extended stay in hospital' to 'death' and then extrapolating it as a theory to apply to those who had a booster in January is just supposition not actual figures.

It needs to be broken down further so we can see how many have died as a result, how many have had serious side effects. And separate them from those who've had to stay a few days extra in hospital. And also how much of that applied to the original vaccine jabs and how much applies to the boosters. IF after that the ratios for death and serious side effects are high there's good weight of evidence behind it.
Click to expand...
There's going to be a lack of evidence though as they just label the deaths as nothing to do with and vaccines and do nothing to really investigate the instances of perfectly healthy people dropping dead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aberdude
luvgonzo said:
There's going to be a lack of evidence though as they just label the deaths as nothing to do with and vaccines and do nothing to really investigate the instances of perfectly healthy people dropping dead.
Click to expand...

spot on dude it’s everything bar the vaccine for the fingers in the ear crowd
 
Peej said:
This is what Bridgen has done, said it’s the vaccine, then called for it to be stopped until problem it isn’t. Where is all the anti vaxx evidence that it’s the biggest public health crime of all time? Just pop that up and then hey presto. But even Malhotra hasn’t managed yet.

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...

wtaf are you on fella apart from lots of prescription drugs

the people who had the Covid vaccine injury or death are not anti vax hence why they have vaccine injuries

makes me wonder why you can turn your back on them purely to protect yourself from the reality that you’re being lied to

shame on you ew deluded mother fkr
 
I get people have underlying medical conditions, that within time may lead to their death. I feel for me the question here is did those people die as only a result of their underlying medical condition OR did they die because the vaccine in some way exacerbated their underlying medical condition/symptoms. Are the medical professionals seeing an increase in patients due to certain symptoms, but are just blaming people delaying in receiving treatment or blaming xyz as long as they don't blame v. Don't mention the v word for vaccine!
 
  • Like
Reactions: aberdude
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back