I think it's probably the media offended more than the British public.
I struggle to see the offence myself, other than making a criminal comparison, ie scale of offence, he never said anything derogatory about what he was referring too.
Let's say the media are right for sake of argument, I worry that it appears an excuse to silence an opinion, an opinion that could be argued is completely wrong, why try to silence it then, unless it puts people at risk - I'd then ask how could it put people at risk because the vaccines and boosters have already been administered.
So all the media are doing really is silencing someone from opening what potentially could be a pandoras box, even if it is a HiaG style pandora box but surely rather than silence it, tell us why he is wrong. Give him an interview to explain himself
Maybe HiaG is a reason he should be shut up, I don't know, I'm just wondering what the measuring stick is for silencing him.
I'm not making a judgement either way of his views, it's merely questions on my part, to why people are dealt with in a certain way, if they say something contrary to opinion.
Maybe he's just a nutter, well call him that then, I think he voted Brexit, so he must be raving lunatic like me.