Not just big corporations. A friend of mine's kids climbed a tree in the park the other day; the local council had sprayed the trees with pesticide, and both kids came up in a rash all over their arms and legs.
Not just big corporations. A friend of mine's kids climbed a tree in the park the other day; the local council had sprayed the trees with pesticide, and both kids came up in a rash all over their arms and legs.
Hope Truss gets it instead of Pob
There obviously something that causes it but at the same time I think loneliness and isolation would be a big contributor to depression .Follow the science init
https://www.ehtrend.com.br/en/pages...-casts-doubt-on-drugs-taken-by-8m-people.html
"The widespread use of antidepressants is “not grounded in science” because depression is not caused by a chemical imbalance, according to a new study.Researcher."
There obviously something that causes it but at the same time I think loneliness and isolation would be a big contributor to depression .
There obviously something that causes it but at the same time I think loneliness and isolation would be a big contributor to depression .
basically people in their position will get full annual leave entitlement instead of a pro rata figure due to the way the law was written .I'm not getting it mate, what is the court suggesting? Tell you why I'm confused is because they are talking in weeks, rather than hours and days, so I'd need a bit more clarity on the story.
basically people in their position will get full annual leave entitlement instead of a pro rata figure due to the way the law was written .
I'm not getting it mate, what is the court suggesting? Tell you why I'm confused is because they are talking in weeks, rather than hours and days, so I'd need a bit more clarity on the story.
no part time workers traditionally get a pro rata rate so if they did 20 hrs per week when the company norm was 40 hrs they would get 50% of the full annual leave entitlement but these cases are in effect to be treated as FT due to the way the legislation was written .Not sure what you mean by that, I thought everyone got full annual leave, but it depends on the calculation which is the bit I'm not getting?
no part time workers traditionally get a pro rata rate so if they did 20 hrs per week when the company norm was 40 hrs they would get 50% of the full annual leave entitlement but these cases are in effect to be treated as FT due to the way the legislation was written .
they were full time but only contracted during term time .Surely if someone only works 20 hours a week, they only need 20 hours holiday to take a week off and be paid their usual going rate?
Hope Truss gets it instead of Pob