Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Its ridiculous bruv. What kind of powers does the speaker have to hold boris to account anyway? Boris has deliberately lied on loads of occasions that can be fact checked so if the speaker wont pull him up on it what the **** is he doing as the speaker <laugh>

Boris probably got him a double whiskey and a gram in the bar as thanks for not sayin anything <whistle>
He’s a spineless, useless **** is the answer.

Johnson is breaking the Ministerial code EVERY time he lies to the House. But guess what? If there’s ever an inquiry into his lies and breaking of the code, as PM he can just ignore the results, as he did when that ****ing ghoul Priti Patel was found to have broken the Ministerial code by an independent inquiry, he just overruled it and said ‘case closed’.

All these ****ing goons currently crying about their fweedoms because they have to wear a mask in a shop and show a negative test to get into a club, haven’t been paying attention for the last 2 years, as this shower of genuinely and demonstrably corrupt ****s have been chipping away at their genuine freedoms via numerous new bills.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
He’s a spineless, useless **** is the answer.

Johnson is breaking the Ministerial code EVERY time he lies to the House. But guess what? If there’s ever an inquiry into his lies and breaking of the code, as PM he can just ignore the results, as he did when that ****ing ghoul Priti Patel was found to have broken the Ministerial code by an independent inquiry, he just overruled it and said ‘case closed’.

All these ****ing goons currently crying about their fweedoms because they have to wear a mask in a shop and show a negative test to get into a club, haven’t been paying attention for the last 2 years, as this shower of genuinely and demonstrably corrupt ****s have been chipping away at their genuine freedoms via numerous new bills.
<applause> absolutely that. Its something i used to see only in yank politics but now its like we have our very own little gang of vipers who unfortunately have the power and will just take more and more of it.

This Omnicron barrage, the human rights bill attacked in the background. The pattern is relentless.

Ps, so who has the power to remove an incompetent speaker? <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
Anyone seen Starmer say that the Tories only won the votes last night cos of Labour and Johnson saying "that's not true"?
The result was 369 votes to 126 and Labour have 199 MPs.
8 voted against in total. And only 1 MP abstained on the votes.
So it clearly was true.

I ain't a Starmer fan...but his face was a picture ... such a shame he ain't got the bollocks to say "are you ****ing serious or wot"?

I think I heard Schapps argue that if Labour had all abstained then the government would've still won the vote.

I'm guessing Boris is referring to this nonsensical bollox.

Just imagine, they actually got together to come up with that before Schapps did the rounds this morning. This is the level our folk in charge have sunk to. There's literally no shame left.
 
<applause> absolutely that. Its something i used to see only in yank politics but now its like we have our very own little gang of vipers who unfortunately have the power and will just take more and more of it.

This Omnicron barrage, the human rights bill attacked in the background. The pattern is relentless.

Ps, so who has the power to remove an incompetent speaker? <laugh>

Don't forget trying to retrospectively change the rules on parliamentary standards to save one of their own who was caught red handed taking bribes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
Because someone always finds fault with the findings of any inquiry.

So? This one may be completely above board and reach the right conclusions, or it may be bent as fck or completely miss key findings and be a cover up.

Or what's more likely, be completely ignored by the government anyway.

But we won't know until it's completed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee
So? This one may be completely above board and reach the right conclusions, or it may be bent as fck or completely miss key findings and be a cover up.

Or what's more likely, be completely ignored by the government anyway.

But we won't know until it's completed.
<laugh> No matter what the findings someone will always come out with that one which is what i'm getting at.
 
I'll take that as no one

...and you twisting yourself in knots.

In fairness, it is that time of night for Diego to do his poor HIAG wum master impression...I'm just surprised he ain't doing on our board like normal :bandit:

Did a corker on Monday night, claiming spurs could have played last Thursday but chose not to because of which players had covid rather than the squad was too depleted...even said united would never do it as they'd always be able to scrape 13 players together ... 12 hours later uniteds game was cancelled ... comic genius <laugh>
 
In fairness, it is that time of night for Diego to do his poor HIAG wum master impression...I'm just surprised he ain't doing on our board like normal :bandit:

Did a corker on Monday night, claiming spurs could have played last Thursday but chose not to because of which players had covid rather than the squad was too depleted...even said united would never do it as they'd always be able to scrape 13 players together ... 12 hours later uniteds game was cancelled ... comic genius <laugh>
And also said (12 hours later) that i was shocked at that happening and can't believe we couldn't muster a full team (and bench) from our squad.
Have heard rumours the league decided to cancel the game but have no evidence of this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.