Coronavirus

[Peej]

The latest lies and contempt demonstrated by this party in Downing Street, for me, is just part of a long list of lies, corruption and contempt by Boris, the cabinet and the inner circle around them.

There's something very nasty and disturbing about the mindset brought about by the absolute power this group of people have been afforded. And the way they can get away with virtually anything without accountability.

It's a combination of a divided and polarised country as much as it is about a morally corrupt government and an almost vacuous opposition.

Our standards are the lowest of the low even by regular political standards.

Very similar to how trump ruled/thought he was above criticism during his time in power.
Boris, like trump has done all he could to get the top job and shown no morals at any stage.

 

[Chief]

There's literally no chance that this will result in an election. Quite the opposite.
They've got a massive majority and they're polling like **** and it'll get worse soon.
They haven't caught up to the Downing St party crap yet and it'll hurt them, albeit temporarily.

I did say should, I didn't say it would.

We are clearly stuck with them for now.

 

[brb]

I'm not really arsed by what Starmer has to say as all he has ever done throughout this is say what he would have done and what they should have done, always with the benefit of hindsight and with no way of backing up what he claims. It's just noise.

He's as much a spoofer as the other bloke, although nowhere near as odious a piece of ****e.

What this should do is bring Johnson down and bring on a general election, forcibly, so we can have some sort of say in all of this.

I don't see the point in forcing a General Election because there is no one worth voting for. So if I cast my vote as I should do, then I just vote Tory again as it's no more bonkers than voting for any of the others.

There is absolutely no way I vote for a party that has Thornberry on their benches or that Caroline Lucas.

Would probably be a poor turnout, unless one of the parties claimed to take us back into Europe, which would be another reason I would vote Tory again.

Out of interest in forcing an election, who would you vote for?

 

[Chief]

I completely agree that I'd vote for neither right now so it would be a waste of time!

At this moment, I don't know tbh, so perhaps a daft suggestion.

Of the two, and if it meant Tories (who I have never voted for, ever) out, I'd use my vote on labour to that end.

But I think Starmer is a wet lettuce who'd be found out instantly. They need to replace him first.

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

You must log in or register to see media

 

[Peej]

I completely agree that I'd vote for neither right now so it would be a waste of time!

At this moment, I don't know tbh, so perhaps a daft suggestion.

Of the two, and if it meant Tories (who I have never voted for, ever) out, I'd use my vote on labour to that end.

But I think Starmer is a wet lettuce who'd be found out instantly. They need to replace him first.

Andy Burnham is the man I feel could sort out Labour

 

[Sucky]

You believe EVERYONE played by the rules, I don't, in fact I know they didn't. Even if it was only one or two in every street, that soon becomes a lot of people, who didn't play by the rules, or certainly not the same rules that I played by.

As someone from the public said on tv, they just got caught (referring to number 10). I know some people probably got prosecuted for not obeying the rules, but I'm no grass, like a lot of people are not grasses, and will have said to themselves, as long has I do the right thing.

Should everyone in Downing Street have played by the rules, of course they should, but people often in every day life fail to look at themselves in a mirror, so does any of this surprise me, no of course not. You're all a bunch of shhites of one kind or another in life.

Yeh but you didnt vote for us to run the country

 

[Sucky]

Leader of the country

Leads by example

cant be compared to members of the public

They are on the higher pedestal because they claim to do the right things for the good of the people.

When they don’t they get and deserve the harsher criticism

Like my mrs said when Hancock got bagged kissing his side chick, if he cant be honest to his wofe and family in his personal life how can you expect him to conduct himseof ilwuth integrity in his professional life...

I told her to stfu and make dinner but she was bang on

 

[Sucky]

Go and have a spliff mate, you are talking politics, Spurly don't do that, you must be getting weed withdrawel symptoms.

Dont attack the wed bro prohibition dont work remember

Go for it mate, whatever floats your boat.

 

[Sucky]

I'm not really arsed by what Starmer has to say as all he has ever done throughout this is say what he would have done and what they should have done, always with the benefit of hindsight and with no way of backing up what he claims. It's just noise.

He's as much a spoofer as the other bloke, although nowhere near as odious a piece of ****e.

What this should do is bring Johnson down and bring on a general election, forcibly, so we can have some sort of say in all of this.

Yes. Because general elections always.... No nevermind.

 

[PINKIE]

I completely agree that I'd vote for neither right now so it would be a waste of time!

At this moment, I don't know tbh, so perhaps a daft suggestion.

Of the two, and if it meant Tories (who I have never voted for, ever) out, I'd use my vote on labour to that end.

But I think Starmer is a wet lettuce who'd be found out instantly. They need to replace him first.

I don’t think Starmer is a very dynamic politician and he’s a bit meh as a personality. But he’s proved that he’s actually a pretty good statesman by holding the positions he has in the past.

He’s pretty methodical and has great attention to detail. He’d undoubtedly do a better job than the twat that’s in office atm. Like Peej though, I’d like to see Andy Burnham lead the party.

For me down here though, Labour are nowhere near winning this seat. It’s a Tory/Lib Dem battle so tactically I would vote Lib Dem again.

It’s a moot point though as this **** won’t shift and the tories have a massive majority so they will continue to treat us all like plebs for the next few years.

 

[Sucky]

I don’t think Starmer is a very dynamic politician and he’s a bit meh as a personality. But he’s proved that he’s actually a pretty good statesman by holding the positions he has in the past.

He’s pretty methodical and has great attention to detail. He’d undoubtedly do a better job than the twat that’s in office atm. Like Peej though, I’d like to see Andy Burnham lead the party.

For me down here though, Labour are nowhere near winning this seat. It’s a Tory/Lib Dem battle so tactically I would vote Lib Dem again.

It’s a moot point though as this **** won’t shift and the tories have a massive majority so they will continue to treat us all like plebs for the next few years.

I blame the dickheads who will vote for him again simply for the fact they think the other guy is a pleb.

Jokes

 

[Saf]

You must log in or register to see media

 

[Saf]

I blame the dickheads who will vote for him again simply for the fact they think the other guy is a pleb.

Jokes

You don't vote, mate. You veto your rights to complain about it by doing so, imho.

 

[Saf]

I'll more than likely not be voting unless Labour/LibDems start making noises about the EU. If that happens I'll vote Tory, again. As bad as the Tory party are now, I still feel the Labour Party and the sack of clowns within it would make things worse for us.

 

[PINKIE]

You must log in or register to see media

Funny as ****. And it actually happened.

Madness

 

[Saf]

Funny as ****. And it actually happened.

Madness

None of us are perfect, mate.

It was last Christmas so I don't see the point in pretending I'm outraged 12 month later.

 

[District Line]

I don’t think Starmer is a very dynamic politician and he’s a bit meh as a personality. But he’s proved that he’s actually a pretty good statesman by holding the positions he has in the past.

He’s pretty methodical and has great attention to detail. He’d undoubtedly do a better job than the twat that’s in office atm. Like Peej though, I’d like to see Andy Burnham lead the party.

For me down here though, Labour are nowhere near winning this seat. It’s a Tory/Lib Dem battle so tactically I would vote Lib Dem again.

It’s a moot point though as this **** won’t shift and the tories have a massive majority so they will continue to treat us all like plebs for the next few years.

In this era of populism I'm not sure Starmer would work.

I live in a safe Labour seat but my parents live in an area that was one of hardest Tory seats in the country to flip until the last election. Lib Dems are making real inroads in large parts of SW London and the South East.

 

[brb]

Andy Burnham is the man I feel could sort out Labour

I thought @Tel said he was a shhite, I could be wrong, I think he's alright, but if Tel says he's a shhite, he's a shhite.

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

In this era of populism I'm not sure Starmer would work.

I live in a safe Labour seat but my parents live in an area that was one of hardest Tory seats in the country to flip until the last election. Lib Dems are making real inroads in large parts of SW London and the South East.

Yet most people would be hard pressed to name the current Lib Dem leader.