Hahaha, incredible how eager you are to dismiss what happened in Dallas yesterday, it’s widely reported everywhere, here’s just a few.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/qanon-jfk-junior-trump-2024-b1949713.html
https://www.forbes.com/sites/teakve...n-dallas-awaiting-return-of-long-dead-jfk-jr/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/11/donald-trump-qanon-jfk-jr-texas
The funniest thing is that you obvs don’t want to believe it, as it makes conspiracy theorists look bad……![]()
Anyway I tweet that doesn't suggest something that isn't there.......better check with vanity mag first though.
You must log in or register to see media
depends what they say, when they report someone dying after receiving a vaccine, they're telling the truth. But anything that doesn't fit w/e Abe's reality is, that'll be the zionists keeping the truth back.If its not Neil Oliver on GB news, Brands on Youtube or anyone on Talkradio then it's just media misinformation Tobes.
Peej I can see you pretending your germ comment didn't happen.....now who's the dull **** the Dr or thick **** peel
https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/germs.html
It’s stinks like a week old mackerel, but we don’t have a politics thread for a reason mate.To anyone who thinks this poisonous, corrupt bunch of ****ers aren't rotten to the core...
Conservative Owen Paterson has avoided punishment for now as the government ordered its MPs to back a review of standards investigations.
The result of the vote was met with cries of "shame" from opposition MPs.
Mr Paterson was found to have misused his position as an MP to benefit two companies he worked for.
But he said the probe into his conduct had been unfair - and the government backed plans by his allies to overhaul the system.
Labour, the SNP and Lib Dems voted against the plans, along with 13 Conservative MPs, but it was carried by 18 votes after a heated Commons debate.
Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner accused the Conservatives of being "rotten to the core" and called the move an "absolute disgrace".
She said Labour would "not be taking any part in this sham process or any corrupt committee", with the SNP and Lib Dems also saying they would boycott the overhaul.
The controversy comes after a committee of MPs recommended Mr Paterson be suspended from the Commons for 30 days, following a damning report into his conduct by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone.
The report said the former Northern Ireland secretary had breached Commons rules by lobbying government bodies about Randox and Lynn's Country Foods, which employed him as a paid consultant.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Boris Johnson said MPs found to have broken the rules should get a right of appeal, as would happen with doctors and teachers found guilty of misconduct.
But the SNP's Pete Wishart accused the government of "attempting to turn back the clock to the worst examples of 1990s Tory sleaze".
There could be serious consequences in Parliament if the opposition parties decide to use this moment to withdraw cooperation on other committees or ways of working.
Some ministers already fear this is an episode that Downing Street may come to regret.
The Commons standards committee found that the North Shropshire MP had used his parliamentary office on 16 occasions for meetings relating to his outside business interests and sent two letters relating to business interests on House of Commons-headed notepaper.
It described the MP's actions as "an egregious case of paid advocacy".
If you don't like the rules and think they don't apply to you once you've been found guilty of breaking them... simply change them. This is the Britain we live in. Like a tinpot fcking backwater state.
To anyone who thinks this poisonous, corrupt bunch of ****ers aren't rotten to the core...
Conservative Owen Paterson has avoided punishment for now as the government ordered its MPs to back a review of standards investigations.
The result of the vote was met with cries of "shame" from opposition MPs.
Mr Paterson was found to have misused his position as an MP to benefit two companies he worked for.
But he said the probe into his conduct had been unfair - and the government backed plans by his allies to overhaul the system.
Labour, the SNP and Lib Dems voted against the plans, along with 13 Conservative MPs, but it was carried by 18 votes after a heated Commons debate.
Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner accused the Conservatives of being "rotten to the core" and called the move an "absolute disgrace".
She said Labour would "not be taking any part in this sham process or any corrupt committee", with the SNP and Lib Dems also saying they would boycott the overhaul.
The controversy comes after a committee of MPs recommended Mr Paterson be suspended from the Commons for 30 days, following a damning report into his conduct by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone.
The report said the former Northern Ireland secretary had breached Commons rules by lobbying government bodies about Randox and Lynn's Country Foods, which employed him as a paid consultant.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Boris Johnson said MPs found to have broken the rules should get a right of appeal, as would happen with doctors and teachers found guilty of misconduct.
But the SNP's Pete Wishart accused the government of "attempting to turn back the clock to the worst examples of 1990s Tory sleaze".
There could be serious consequences in Parliament if the opposition parties decide to use this moment to withdraw cooperation on other committees or ways of working.
Some ministers already fear this is an episode that Downing Street may come to regret.
The Commons standards committee found that the North Shropshire MP had used his parliamentary office on 16 occasions for meetings relating to his outside business interests and sent two letters relating to business interests on House of Commons-headed notepaper.
It described the MP's actions as "an egregious case of paid advocacy".
If you don't like the rules and think they don't apply to you once you've been found guilty of breaking them... simply change them. This is the Britain we live in. Like a tinpot fcking backwater state.
I hope he was paying the right amount of tax on that second income.To anyone who thinks this poisonous, corrupt bunch of ****ers aren't rotten to the core...
Conservative Owen Paterson has avoided punishment for now as the government ordered its MPs to back a review of standards investigations.
The result of the vote was met with cries of "shame" from opposition MPs.
Mr Paterson was found to have misused his position as an MP to benefit two companies he worked for.
But he said the probe into his conduct had been unfair - and the government backed plans by his allies to overhaul the system.
Labour, the SNP and Lib Dems voted against the plans, along with 13 Conservative MPs, but it was carried by 18 votes after a heated Commons debate.
Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner accused the Conservatives of being "rotten to the core" and called the move an "absolute disgrace".
She said Labour would "not be taking any part in this sham process or any corrupt committee", with the SNP and Lib Dems also saying they would boycott the overhaul.
The controversy comes after a committee of MPs recommended Mr Paterson be suspended from the Commons for 30 days, following a damning report into his conduct by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone.
The report said the former Northern Ireland secretary had breached Commons rules by lobbying government bodies about Randox and Lynn's Country Foods, which employed him as a paid consultant.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Boris Johnson said MPs found to have broken the rules should get a right of appeal, as would happen with doctors and teachers found guilty of misconduct.
But the SNP's Pete Wishart accused the government of "attempting to turn back the clock to the worst examples of 1990s Tory sleaze".
There could be serious consequences in Parliament if the opposition parties decide to use this moment to withdraw cooperation on other committees or ways of working.
Some ministers already fear this is an episode that Downing Street may come to regret.
The Commons standards committee found that the North Shropshire MP had used his parliamentary office on 16 occasions for meetings relating to his outside business interests and sent two letters relating to business interests on House of Commons-headed notepaper.
It described the MP's actions as "an egregious case of paid advocacy".
If you don't like the rules and think they don't apply to you once you've been found guilty of breaking them... simply change them. This is the Britain we live in. Like a tinpot fcking backwater state.

Being chatted about on spurs board mateIt just riles me it's happening here, and needs to be called out, but I can respect this isn't the place to post politics![]()
Being chatted about on spurs board mate