Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not so easy for the social beings to stay in like you fella.......shame on her......strip her naked the witch

she will have been classed as clinically extremely vulnerable. So had a priority slot for shopping and ability to work from home. She just showed herself up as a ****.
 
So she doesn’t have to have it, it’s not mandatory, but if she has based on her own free will you will be taking a hammer to the school?

She had that chat with the parents.....the only people who qualify to know if your kid can do something or not if it could be detrimental to thy health.

Now all you guys that say the children can decide on medical treatment they could never understand.......why were you up in arms about them voting on thy futures not so long ago when there was talk about dropping the voting age.
 
she will have been classed as clinically extremely vulnerable. So had a priority slot for shopping and ability to work from home. She just showed herself up as a ****.

Clinically extremely vulnerable........ffs fella.....she just wanted to shop like she did pre covid..........she got stripped naked for the crime of........going out <applause>
 
Clinically extremely vulnerable........ffs fella.....she just wanted to shop like she did pre covid..........she got stripped naked for the crime of........going out <applause>


She just wanted to go break the law, and potentially spread disease during a pandemic... Poor lady.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peej
None, it's a made up excuse and not one which would excuse her, which is why the police escorted her out. If this were in a courtroom she is what would be described as an unreliable witness.

She's proven herself to be a liar, which makes the rest fairly unbelievable. If she was stripped without cause, that's terrible... But I suspect she's either lying, or lying through omission, leaving some important detail out that explains what really happened.


But... If she really got stripped for no reason, that's terrible... That's the problem with crying wolf. Lie about one thing and people won't believe you when you're telling the truth.
She didn’t get stripped at all, she got told to remove her clothes herself and stick on the cell clobber, which she did.

Her entire story is horse ****, now she’s grifting cash out of gullible ****wits for a supposed case against the old bill, that’s she’s put a £50k target on. If she had anything like a credible case I’m sure there’d have been a lawyer out there who’d take it on pro bono, or no win, no fee.
 
The article doesn't give any proof of that. Just a bogus reason (that would NOT make you eligible to not wear a mask, it would actually make one more needed).

Honestly, from the article what I got was a propaganda-piece trying to push a no-story based on some woman who is quite clearly a habitual liar.

It's tabloid trash.

Daily mails a ****ty newspaper and because everyone has commented i thought i'd read.

Out of curiosity, where have you found that she made up a bunch of porkies and is a habitual liar? All i've read is that she said she was exempt and has 3 NHS letters or something confirming that.

this is all on her side of course, was there something that countered all this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: aberdude
Out of curiosity, where have you found that she made up a bunch of porkies and is a habitual liar? All i've read is that she said she was exempt and has 3 NHS letters or something confirming that.


Autoimmune disease doesn't mean you can't wear a mask. In fact people with autoimmune diseases should be taking more precautions and it's even more important for them to wear a mask because they are higher risk. Not just to themselves but to others.

So no, I doubt she has an NHS exclusion either because they wouldn't give her one, she lied about that. She probably printed her own card at home like so many of the crazies do and the police knew it wasn't real.

I actually searched the autoimmune institute website to make sure there wasn't some special cases I'm not familiar with that excludes them and couldn't find one. Just found them recommending people with autoimmune disorders wear a mask like every other medical website.

Her whole excuse why she says she can't wear a mask is a lie. She told it to the shopkeeper, the police, and the daily mail.

In fact, the only thing can tell for certain about her is that she's lying... Probably to make a political statement like most of the people who deliberately don't wear masks and then go into stores primed to make a scene. Sounds like the shopkeeper was very polite about it and called the police rather than getting involved in the tantrum himself... Which was probably the right thing to do.
 
FYI legitimate reasons and excuses to not wear a mask:

Under two years old.
Extreme pulmonary disorder (ie you're so sick you should be in a hospital not a shop)
You are unconscious.


Those are the only three recognized "medical reasons" to not wear a mask. The closest to any of those three excuses she could probably make is that she was unconscious.
 
Daily mails a ****ty newspaper and because everyone has commented i thought i'd read.

Out of curiosity, where have you found that she made up a bunch of porkies and is a habitual liar? All i've read is that she said she was exempt and has 3 NHS letters or something confirming that.

this is all on her side of course, was there something that countered all this?

Thank you for not making up a story like the others did............I see how they work on here dude....I'm glad others do too.

Peace brother
 
She didn’t get stripped at all, she got told to remove her clothes herself and stick on the cell clobber, which she did.

Her entire story is horse ****, now she’s grifting cash out of gullible ****wits for a supposed case against the old bill, that’s she’s put a £50k target on. If she had anything like a credible case I’m sure there’d have been a lawyer out there who’d take it on pro bono, or no win, no fee.

Make up what you like you weird fkr
 
Matth is easier to explain things to, so I wouldn’t waste your breath. His responses lack substance and he’s often contradicting himself.
I note he’s run away when asked to justify his own accusation. He’s dense and exactly the kind of person grifters and bullshitters both target & rely on. The irony being he thinks he’s superior & enlightened compared to the rest of us, Dunning-Kruger ahoy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson owns Fosse
Daily mails a ****ty newspaper and because everyone has commented i thought i'd read.

Out of curiosity, where have you found that she made up a bunch of porkies and is a habitual liar? All i've read is that she said she was exempt and has 3 NHS letters or something confirming that.

this is all on her side of course, was there something that countered all this?


I can go get NHS exemption as a transplant patient. Still don’t have trouble breathing. Also have friends post lung and heart transplant who have exemption but don’t apply and wear. In fact they know wearing one is important.

she is just a ****wit who is getting no sympathy, apart from mail reader and will be championed by someone like Morgan as being anti woke or whatever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.