Coronavirus

Indeed, it's absolutely not necessary for this age group and serves no purpose.

I genuinely think it should be given to the more needy than coerced onto this age band.

 

Nice one bobbyDude

If I had said the same thing it wouldn't be so highlighting

 

Kids got more chance of getting heart conditions at a young age if they accept this vaccine they don't need.......shame on whitty and the fraudsters taking risks with other people's children.

Not that they give a fk for children the **** fkrs

 

See bbc own figures in what are the risks and benefits

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59107256

 

why do you always accuse anyone you don't like of being a "****" ?

 

Think they already know what's coming.......fking scumbags.....pushers and takers are getting a bit of a problem don't you agree

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pre...first-oral-blood-thinning-medication-children

 

we know that is why the vaccination committee said they wouldn't recommend it on purely health grounds .

 

Sorry maybe I'm stereotyping......but politicians have a history of being anything but moralistic and child fiddling is a trait so it seems

 

Yet.......what's happening instead

 

i'm more than willing to bet that the percentage is the same as the general population and any person with power over others particularly in closed "societies" are the most dangerous . To constantly accuse random people of such heinous behaviour dreadful behaviour imo though i'm not convinced you actually constitutes what is a *****phile .
Oh and Whitty isn't a politician at least in the normal sense .

 

Well there we go then jobs a good un fella......

https://cuttingthroughthematrix.com...t_of_Convicted_British_Paedo_Politicians.html

 

Anyway, enough of seedy high flyers, what's your take on whitty and Co overruling the vaccine committee advice on safety

 

because the chief scientific officers passed it on other grounds as you know because we discussed it at the time .

 

not strictly what happened as the vaccine ( cant remember its full title ) committee said there were no medical reasons to vaccinating that age group as the number who became seriously ill would be cancelled out by the risks of the vaccine(s) though other factors could be considered but that was not within their remit .
If iirc they also said they would prefer to wait till their was more data from the countries that were vaccinating that age group .

 

And yet here we are......who would have known this would happen hey

Seems some of u guys can't see the wood for the trees

 

I can see fine thanks

 

So who's gonna carry the can if it goes tits up...its not big pharma as we know they been given the keys to the city and are exempt because the emergency.....don't know WHO would have made that mountain out of a mole hill lol

 

same as normal no one - as in this case there is no lowly figure to pin it on .

 

Do you even understand the reason for vaccination programmes?

Your kids will have been vaccinated against polio for example, many cases of that round your way?