Neither do you but you happily roll up your sleeve and hope for the best knowing that the people pushing them have constantly lied to you and moved the goalposts further and further . Will you be getting your third ?
Well any percentage of graphine oxide shot into your cells is probably not great . I wouldn't be at all surprised if they use it in the shots . Nothing would surprise me at this stage , the Transhumanism frankenstein science is beyond science fiction. Elon claims to be able to run Google directly through the human brain with implants. Shooting self replicating super conductive crap into humans is pretty basic by today's standards. Or it could just be really healthy medicine that stops you from getting sick just as long as you inject the latest never ending series of boosters . Which is the sensible theory for these jabs. And that's ****ing mental
Your Spanish Uni that initially made the claim have backed off, and said they're not even sure it was a vaccine they were testing, or if it was graphene oxide they saw. There is none in the vaccine..
I had a quick Google and all I could find was pages of authoritative source fact checks saying the vaccines are safe and effective . So will you be taking your boosters ? It's not my claim and it's not my Spanish University, I am just repeating what I discovered the same as everyone regarding the jabs. They are neither safe or effective that much we know.
Move the goal posts back. Not only do they not contain 90% + graphene oxide, as was your claim, the Uni you cited doesn't even know if it was a vaccine they tested, and aren't even sure it was graphene oxide they saw anyway. That is the conversation, and kills the key fact you were basing your fears on.
I trust you have a link to this ? The claim was 99% From memory I believe it was a University In Andalusia
FYI 99% is 90% + https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-grapheneoxide-vaccine-idUSL1N2OZ14F https://fullfact.org/online/graphene-oxide/
So he wanted to test a Pfizer covid vaccine to see what's in it and he discovered what looks like graphine oxide. He now claims that he doesn't know for sure if it was actually the Pfizer vaccine. Surely to make sure he should be sent another one from Pfizer or the local vaccination Centre to debunk this myth. I guess he just shrugged his shoulders and gave up his research. Yep science in 2021 don't question anything shut up and take your shots. Are you getting your 3rd the 1st booster ? Not sure why you won't answer, there is no such thing as bodily autonomy or privacy anymore . A security guard at a premier league football match will demand to see proof of vaccination to enter the stadium . You will have to carry proof that you had your 3rd jab or be branded an anti vaxxer science denier conspiracy theorist like me. Papers please
He had no idea what he had, nor what he saw, and the Uni cringed at the work he 'did' and distanced themselves. At the level you initially claimed, it is impossible to get that amount in the vaccine. If you had 99%, it would be visible even to the untrained eye.
As I said the scientific approach would have been to get another sample but I guess he just gave up . I'll take your non answer as a Yes and you will submit to as many boosters as required to keep your vaccine status.
I'm ignoring your booster question, as the first bit isn't finished, so I just see it as an attempted distraction. There are plenty of verified scientific studies into the vaccine and its contents. Your initial claims are clearly unscientific on a number of levels. Just face it, the graphene oxide claims are pure bullshit.
It's a conversation not a competition. A scientist receives what he was told was a Pfizer vaccine, puts it under a microscope and sees what he believes was graphine oxide. Turns out that it was a joke and he looks foolish now and is so embarrassed that he gave up his research. Another victory for science and you , have a medal. Weird that you refuse to get your 3rd shot
It doesn't scare me because I didn't take any of the shots I'm not scared of getting blood clots either for the same reason . The follow up story should have been that another sample of vaccine was given to him and this time it's super legit and disclose his findings. Graphine oxide is used in hydrogel as a drug delivery system so it's not unimaginable that it's used in these vaccines. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41428-020-0350-9
Except the company that makes it, and the people that check it, and others have said that there is no graphine oxide in the product, and you were saying the 99% claim was part of your reluctance to take it. As that claim was so far off the mark, it should make you yourself question some of the other things you think have 'informed' your reluctance.
I'm reluctant to take any of the shots because the people that agreed to take their 2 shots in order to get back to normal have been duped into taking a 3rd 4th and probably 5th 6th 7th etc. This wasn't the deal you were hoodwinked into it . I find it mind-blowing that you are so eager to keep experimenting on yourself with vaccines that are neither effective or safe . My neighbour took his second jab recently he was 45 years old and died of a heart attack 4 days after the injection. It wasn't registered as a vaccine adverse reaction .
I don't blame you for shifting the subject away from your initial claim, now that you can see it's bollocks, and you seem to be trying to ascribe your own whacky reasons why someone may have had the vaccine.
"The "vaccine? I can see why you are reluctant to admit that you have been taken for a mug and hopefully won't take your never ending series of booster shots in order to satisfy the criteria for your vaccine passport. Surely you are not dumb enough to continue shooting these experimental drugs into your cells ? At least there's hope for you
