The problem I have with some of this information is how it is used by others to further their own agendas
Eg the interpretation that was put on the comments of the head of the WHO
Whereby the conspiracy theorists were claiming that that covid was being used to kill off the elderly.
Just read a piece whereby the comments made by the head of Pfizer were taken out of context by selecting edited comments to prove that he said the vaccines didn’t work, known as selective reporting to further someone’s agenda
Where did I mention any of that and where is that mentioned in the link I posted?
It really is like pulling teeth with some on here! As Emu says, "that's why they're asking for an investigation"
Absolutely nothing I posted, apart from my own view that big pharma are in control of the message, is a conspiracy theory.
It is very simple. There are anomolies that warrant further investigation.
As Brizzle said, it doesn't say whether the children were vaccinated when they died. Don't you think that is an important piece of information?
All through this pandemic we've had to fight for basic information. It shouldn't be like that.
For example, what is the point of listing all those who were admitted to hospital within 28 days of a positive test?
You can be a Covid death without even having Covid when you died.
You can catch Covid in hospital, even though you had no symptoms and were admitted for something else, and you're a Covid admission.
Under 10k people actually died of Covid in 2020. The vast majority were over 65. This is yet more ONS data that you'll argue about...