corners

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Poyet's Eleven

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2011
7,397
99
48
London
Something I noticed quite a while ago, is everytime we defend a corner, we bring everyone back, completely eliminating the chance of a break. We just clear it back to their players and we're under pressure again. I reckon we could get a few goals by leaving some one like Gyan up.
 
Something I noticed quite a while ago, is everytime we defend a corner, we bring everyone back, completely eliminating the chance of a break. We just clear it back to their players and we're under pressure again. I reckon we could get a few goals by leaving some one like Gyan up.

Been saying this for 3 seasons now.
We were 2-0 up against somebody last season with 10 mins to go and still did it. I can understand the routine in training over and over again but for gods sake have a bit flexibility depending on the score
 
Said he would consider it. The next game we had a man on the halfway line, my mate was claiming to be SAFC manager.
Bruce must not of seen the benefit tho as we are back to our old way's.
It's not even just about the counter attack, putting a man at half way mean's 2 of their player's have to drop back. Surely it's better to have them there than in your penaly area.
 
Said he would consider it. The next game we had a man on the halfway line, my mate was claiming to be SAFC manager.
Bruce must not of seen the benefit tho as we are back to our old way's.
It's not even just about the counter attack, putting a man at half way mean's 2 of their player's have to drop back. Surely it's better to have them there than in your penaly area.

Exactly, by leaving nobody up we're just inviting them to pack the box.
 
This has been done since Peter Reid was here, and it bloody well boils my piss...I've always been from the school of thought that suggests the best form of defence is attack...And this doesn't fit in with that..
 
This has been done since Peter Reid was here, and it bloody well boils my piss...I've always been from the school of thought that suggests the best form of defence is attack...And this doesn't fit in with that..

There surely is a reason behind it, but I mean losing Gyan or Sess in the box won't affect our defending of the corner.
 
If you leave Sess and Gyan up field that means the attacking team has to leave 3-4 players back, they cant just leave 1-2 back and pile everyone else into the box, which means there is less players in the box to defend against, so we dont need Sess and Gyan back.

And you would think Bruce and Keane would realise the potential of a quick break, after playing with Schmeichal and his long throw outs from corners for years.
 
When I ran a kids team we always had 2 players on the half way line. This was 7 a side mind. It automatically took 3 of their players back. If Bruce put all our player in the box it only invites the other team to come and have a go. If we put 3 players outside the box it would automatically take 4 of their players out. It's crazy us not doing this because we now have raw paces in the side.
 
Whole hearted agree hate that tactic. Leave sess on half way line to chase a punt I say. What good is he at defending crosses?