Off Topic Conspiracy Thread
- Thread starter Building 7
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Aside from people actually seeing aliens, reliable people confirming they exist and literally a ****ton of craft sightings over he last 100 years, there's absolutely no reason to think aliens have visited our planet.
People say that they have 'actually seen ghosts' and there's been a ****ton of 'sightings' of them over the last 100 years.
Except there actually hasn't.
You're not looking hard enough. The clues are there, even down to a documentary filmed in the future, and yet shown on tv today. There are even other programmes showing the natural progression.
More and more people exist in a world without money, and spend their time in the same clothes, day in day out, sat in a chair with a few mates round, all staring at the tv. You can see this in the Royal Family, before it evolves in to what is a documentary showing the future of this existence, Star Trek.
Ghost cavemen, ghost conjoined twins, ghost people squashed into a pulp in factory machinery....
The only people who "see" aliens are handlebard rednecks who shag their own dad and claim to have been probed to save face. Probably.
What a shame none of them thought to take a close up photo of any of them. Unexplained sightings of lights and shapes sreUFOs not craft sightings.
Which reliable people have said they exist? Any links to them?
Some people think the Royal Family are reptiles.
I just think they're boring.
Definitive proof from John Glenn.
You must log in or register to see media
That being said, whilst I find the current Royals dull, the history of the British monarchy is interesting. Her Majesty can trace her ancestry to every monarchical ruler of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, going as far back as the 6th century. She can claim descent from William the Conqueror (first Norman king), Alfred the Great (first King of the Anglo-Saxons), Harold Godwinson (last Saxon king), Sweyn Forkbeard (first Danish King of England), Brian Boru (High King of Ireland), Llywelyn the Great (Prince of Gwynedd), Kenneth MacAlpin (first King of Scots), Cerdic (first King of the West Saxons), meaning she's descended from the House of Wessex, House of Knýtlinga, House of Normandy, House of Blois, House of Angevin, House of Plantagenet (including Houses of York and Lancaster), House of Tudor, House of Stuart, House of Orange, House of Hanover, House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, House of Wettin and House of Windsor.
She can't claim descent from the Kings of Jórvík at all, cause Danes/Norsemen based in Yorkshire elected their kings as they were more like tribal chieftains or military commanders than the archetypal monarch in European Christendom.
She can't claim descent from the Kings of Jórvík at all, cause Danes/Norsemen based in Yorkshire elected their kings as they were more like tribal chieftains or military commanders than the archetypal monarch in European Christendom.
But she and her kids are German according to some. Meanwhile the same people consider some folks who have been here a couple of years are British as the rest of us. Especially if they are good at athletics and similar.
Great film. Dunt prove nowt, but still a top movie...
You must log in or register to see media
Well, that might be the only thing me and you will ever agree on. I find it ridiculously hypocritical when people call the Windsors 'German' but consider Mo Farah English or British. Either they both are or neither are. It's whether you consider someone British or English based on their ancestry or the country they were born in. Personally, I find using someone's nationality or ethnic background as an argument to be weak. If most of your ancestors lived in a particular region of England prior to the industrial revolution, it's highly probable you can trace your ancestry to the same people that lived in that area since the Medieval/late antiquity period because feudalism meant a lack of movement for generations, whether your were peasant or noble. For example, if you do a family tree and a lot of your 18th century ancestors lived in East Yorkshire prior to the industrial revolution, then the majority of your genetic makeup would be North Germanic as East Yorkshire was predominantly populated by Northumbrian Angles and Danes (note that Anglo-Saxon and Danish genetics are indistingusiable because they both came from the Jutland peninsula; Norwegian DNA is a little different).
Last edited:
