Today's posts were brought to you by the Number 20 and the words "without a win"
Point proved, nice one Burt.


Today's posts were brought to you by the Number 20 and the words "without a win"


Point proved, nice one Burt.![]()
Proved - or just playing along for funsies Bwi?
Thought it was all banter after all?

I thought it was banter but then you started crying on like a little bitch saying people need to change their tune after repeating themselves despite saying virtually the same thing every post you made, you than carry on hence proving my point. All I've done is point it out and take the piss.
Or is it banter for you to point it out in one of our posters, but not banter for me to point out you're doing exactly the same thing? Aye, thought that was the way you were playing it, and now you're crying on bring up banter too. Typical backwards Mag you are![]()
Chears Mate.Oh, and for future reference it's Bert as in Bert & Ernie, not Burt, you ****ing spoon!

Oh, and for future reference it's Bert as in Bert & Ernie, not Burt, you ****ing spoon!

Chears Mate.![]()
Just for clarity
Is that chears as in the archaic variant of the word cheers
or
Chears as in Children’s Hearing Evaluation & Amplification Resource
It's good to have a precise understanding of your response
Oh he ****ing grammar spanner too. Of course.![]()
Except it's actually a reference to your incorrect spelling of the word Bert, not a grammatical inaccuracy - although actually, having missed the word "is" out of your reply, makes that grammatically incorrect - so you were actually correct - just about the wrong post
Sado has 2 a'sCarry on petty lad. Proper grasping having ago at written errors in posts. What a sado, you can pull a dyslexic poster to bits on his English just cause you've got no comeback on the original points. Well done, you've won the forum.![]()
Just for clarity
Is that chears as in the archaic variant of the word cheers
or
Chears as in Children’s Hearing Evaluation & Amplification Resource
It's good to have a precise understanding of your response
Cheers mate.Except it's actually a reference to your incorrect spelling of the word Bert, not a grammatical inaccuracy - although actually, having missed the word "is" out of your reply, makes that grammatically incorrect - so you were actually correct - just about the wrong post

This has got **** all to do with me, but you had to have an idiotic dig, didn't youAnd you're doing it with him. Gordon will be wanting to suck you off in public bogs at this rate.

This has got **** all to do with me, but you had to have an idiotic dig, didn't you
Cheers, Bri.
