Really? So where's the overwhelming evidence to support this outlandish assertion? Daily Mail pull-out? Express? Sun? Get a grip. You've been brainwashed by the media. Take a good look at yourself. You've never struck me as being gullible before.
Jeremy Corbyn refuses to condemn IRA for terrorist atrocities. Jeremy Corbyn reunites with his old 'comrade' Gerry Adams Fury as Corbyn SNUBS National Anthem Tells me all I need to know about the piece of ****. And your right,the London benefits were built up by the last Labour Government in the guy on TV's case and are correctly being targeted now.His £1300 monthly housing benefit was cut by £100 but should have been by £600 at least.
The last Labour government allowed the Muslim claw man claim £50,000 a year in benefits,go on tell me Corbyn would clamp down on this.Dreaming.
Are you sure you don't live on Mars not Weatherby,when has a Labour government ever stopped benefit abuse,never mind one with ultra left views.
A nice collection of anti-Corbyn newspaper headlines there. But are any of them true and unbiased? If so, I must go back and read that story about the WWII bomber that landed on the moon. Corbyn probably crashed it when trying to bomb Buck Palace during the Boer war. And the tories reduced this guy's benefits by 7.7%. Wow! What a bad-ass he was. And don't even begin to mention the previous Government in this case. How long have the bastard tories been in power now? 6 years not long enough to change the benefit rules? Oh, wait a minute. They have! And loudly & brashly told us all about it too! So it was them that were paying the guy too much. For 6 years+. Height of incompetence if you ask me. But of course, it must be Corbyn's fault, even though he had nothingto do with it. The Daily Mail said so! You're beyond mega-gullible. Is giga-gullible or tetra-gullible a term yet, or are you first in the new categorisation?
Slowly cutting the benifits bill,still a long way to go,glad you've changed your mind and now believe they should come down harder.
It's Wetherby, btw. First article I found in my Google search blows your argument out of the water. Sorry, did I say argument there? My apologies - it should be unfounded & unsupportable opinion.
well now he's where he should be,who sent him there,Corbyn would probably welcome him back and pay him compensation.
Slowly is an exaggeration. They're not that quick. My complaint is that they do not approach it in a fair and upstanding manner. Or do you disagree with that too? What does the Daily Mail say about it?
Another unfounded and unsupportable assertion. Really? This belongs in the playground. You know nothing about the guy.
Funny you and Glory know everything about the daily mail,I said earlier never bought or read it ever.
