1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Confirmed: V6-turbo engines for 2014

Discussion in 'Formula 1' started by WestCoastBoogaloo, Jun 16, 2011.

  1. Masanari

    Masanari Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,347
    Likes Received:
    12
    I believe they are going to produce their own engines.
     
    #61
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 27, 2014
  2. Kyle?

    Kyle? New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    15,002
    Likes Received:
    137
    They've had some practice with their supercar, the mp4 12-c. What kind of a car name is that, anyway?
     
    #62
  3. Delete Me

    Delete Me Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,361
    Likes Received:
    27
    A V8 for 2013 and a V6 turbo for 2014. Seems a bit much to concentrate with only 2 years left.
     
    #63
  4. Masanari

    Masanari Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,347
    Likes Received:
    12
    According to this a very boring name:
     
    #64
  5. Masanari

    Masanari Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,347
    Likes Received:
    12
    Maybe they will try and get an extension on their Mercedes contract so that it ends after 2013.
     
    #65
  6. Kyle?

    Kyle? New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    15,002
    Likes Received:
    137
    So this is my name in mclaren speak then

    Kyle 100-F

    Kyle - My Name
    100 - I Rule
    F - I'm a fat git.
     
    #66
  7. Delete Me

    Delete Me Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,361
    Likes Received:
    27
    Maybe, but Mercedes might be ready to challenge for the WCC+WDC at that time and they wont want drivers with their engines in the way.
     
    #67
  8. El_Bando

    El_Bando Can't remember, where was I?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    14,374
    Likes Received:
    1,830
    MP4 = Marlboro Project 4.... oh yer they changed it didnt they lol
     
    #68
  9. Prime Minister Cameron

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,360
    Likes Received:
    0
    McLaren have enough money and resources and experience to deal with this problem if it comes about.

    <ok>
     
    #69
  10. El_Bando

    El_Bando Can't remember, where was I?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    14,374
    Likes Received:
    1,830
    Mclaren wont need to do anything as they are only a customer of mercedes
     
    #70

  11. Delete Me

    Delete Me Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,361
    Likes Received:
    27
    Red Bull been biting at Mercedes ankles because of engines for ages now, McLaren vetoed them out. Be interesting if they say no or yes to both.
     
    #71
  12. Kyle?

    Kyle? New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    15,002
    Likes Received:
    137
    F1 as a sport is lucky that red bull didn't get the merc engines. It would have been 2004 all over again if theyd got them. At least the others are giving rbr a fight this season.
     
    #72
  13. Delete Me

    Delete Me Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,361
    Likes Received:
    27
    Sebastians the new bargaining chip for Red Bull, German=German engines ;)
     
    #73
  14. Masanari

    Masanari Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    4,347
    Likes Received:
    12
    The Mercedes engine may produce more power than the Renault but the Renault engine is more efficient and Renault have developed the engine mapping the best, so they each have their own advantages.
     
    #74
  15. cosicave

    cosicave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,277
    Likes Received:
    660

    Sorry, I did not see this earlier Genji.

    The proposed configuration was for it to be a straight four, in order to comply with the most common engine layout for the average road car. - Utterly ludicrous in my view. Why restrict anyone to a prescriptive layout which does away with the very possibility of finding greater efficiency under a different format? - Daft in my view&#8230;
     
    #75
  16. genjigonzales

    genjigonzales Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    4,414
    Likes Received:
    8
    Cheers, cosi. I hadn't seen the configuration mentioned before. Yes - far too restrictive and shortsighted.
     
    #76
  17. cosicave

    cosicave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,277
    Likes Received:
    660

    Here's the cynic in me:

    The whole idea was a political nod to VW Audi, who planned it as part of their marketing strategy and perhaps by coincidence lost interest in supplying F1 engines some time back&#8230;
     
    #77
  18. Max Whiplash

    Max Whiplash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Messages:
    4,094
    Likes Received:
    156
    I'm intrigued as to where this leaves Todt: in the last couple of weeks the President had been undermined and overruled by Max and Bernie, not once but twice now, with Bahrain and this. It doesn't say much for his authority.
     
    #78
  19. Kyle?

    Kyle? New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    15,002
    Likes Received:
    137
    Hopefully he'll resign.
     
    #79
  20. cosicave

    cosicave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,277
    Likes Received:
    660
    Yes. He is being shown to be of poor judgement. I can assure you Max, that you are not the only one with such thoughts.

    His intention to be perceived as being decisive is being shown to be little more than that of a gambler, playing the odds that his decisions work out, thus leaving him bathing in good light. But it is becoming clear to those who previously did not know otherwise, that his decisions are made in the thinking that he simply goes along with the flavour of the month, expecting it all to pan out as planned, thereby leaving him without a headache.

    Worse still, in the light of obvious criticism about the Bahrain fiasco, he came out all guns blazing, stating that it would categorically go ahead! How very foolish.

    And of course this is why clever old Max Mosley chose an indecisive weakling in the first place&#8230;
     
    #80

Share This Page