Not as novel as a racist with connections to Chelsea, though. Don't get many of them.
Clattenberg NOT GUILTY
- Thread starter Chelsea Pensioner
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Not as novel as a racist with connections to Chelsea, though. Don't get many of them.
Racist?
For asking if it was yiddish?
Good job I never said double dutch.
Move on son you're out of your depth.
Racist?
For asking if it was yiddish?
Good job I never said double dutch.
Move on son you're out of your depth.
Your excuses are as believable as those of your captain.
Give it up please Poll! OK , you are a Spud and I can understand why you like to fire bullets at the fans of a classier team, but Lord above, this subject has now run way into overtime! Lets try and move on to something more interesting ! Yes?
Quite frankly lad I don't give a monkeys **** what you think.
Tata
You said monkey! Racist! Investigation!
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
King Ossie64 seems to have anger-management issues.
Did other children laugh at you, at school? Was it the strange haircuts? The National Health glasses?
It's all right, you know. You're among friends, here. We love you for who you are, not what you look like, or what clothes you wear.
If you want to rage, let it out and let it go. We won't judge you.
Did other children laugh at you, at school? Was it the strange haircuts? The National Health glasses?
It's all right, you know. You're among friends, here. We love you for who you are, not what you look like, or what clothes you wear.
If you want to rage, let it out and let it go. We won't judge you.
No issues here though we might like to investigate some of your inflammatory comments dickbrain. 'The home of the burning cross' then you go and cry to mr spud mod because the nasty Chelsea fan questioned whether your infantile vocabulary was in yiddish?
As I said if you can't comment without being a smuck then **** off.
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
I believe you.
Damn! I was so sure that someone with a sense of humour would have explained that one to you!
Who went crying to whom? I didn't even know that you have made an anti-semitic remark. I'm not Jewish, by the way. I know that, traditionally, Spurs have had a strong connection with London's Jewish community, but, in truth, I have met only one Spurs fan (of the many hundreds that I have known over the years, the world over) who was Jewish. I certainly would not condone anti-semitism - any more than I would encourage the propagation of any hatred against a group or class of persons - but I cannot say that I would be particularly upset by the mild abuse that is occasionally thrown at us Spurs fans on this forum, on that score.
You seem to have made a rash and erroneous assumption, this time round, I'm afraid. Not guilty.
...**** off.
All joking aside, that kind of comment is utterly uncalled for.
I didn't make an anti semitic comment, I asked if your comment was in yiddish? it was the dick brain who thinks everybody is anti-jewish because we think Spuds are a joke. (Although he did remind me of the John Cleese character at the stoning in the life of Brian
) Quite frankly since you've been let back on our cherished board you've done nothing other than be a prat, making stupid comments. If you want to discuss football or Chelsea football club pull your head out of your arse because a comedian you are not.
H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
... a comedian you are not.
Do you get yourself out to many comedy clubs?
You don't strike me as the kind of bloke who laughs a lot, Ossie.
Agree with you mate, Chelsea are now becoming the most hated team in England with this embarassing accusation. You lost, the ref had a shocker and decisions went against Chelsea, so what, it happens to all teams at some stage, doesn't mean its right, but refs are only human, they make mistakes. It only looks from a neutral view of sore losers, its quite pathetic really.
All the officials agree with Clattenburg that no racism was heard, yet some Chelsea players were heard abusing and threatening the ref after the game in his dressing room, but that ok, because they are Chelsea players and Chelsea fans only see and hear what they want to hear.
Its just getting out of hand, get over it, watch a rugby game or Aussie Rules footy game and see how much respect the players have for the referee/umpire, then compare it with the ignorant professional footballers of today. The refs in todays game get too much abuse from players on both sides, yet when the ref tells a player where to go, then all hell breaks loose.
Clattenburg is a terrible ref, I agree, however nothing will come of this as their is ZERO evidence or racial abuse. I wonder if Cattenburg will sue for defamation and loss of wages?
Clattenburg will definitely sue and he will win one of the cases without it even going to court. Chelsea accused him of racially abusing a Spanish player, they made this accusation public. Soon after they withdrew it having taken independent legal advice but by that time the damage had already been done to Clattenburg's reputation not only in England but internationally ie the story was carried by the Spanish papers. Unbelievably **** management by Chelsea's legal and communication departments.
Did Phelan ever got sued or even fined by the FA for giving a false statement that could have wrecked the reputation of the Chelsea employee?, did the FA set their precedent in that case of deliberate lying?
Previous
2 of 15
Next[h=2]Patrice Evra Brawling with Chelsea Staff Member Sam Bethell[/h]
You must log in or register to see images
About three and half years ago, the tag Battle of Stamford Bridge was the storyline, as Patrice Evra was involved in an unsavoury incident with Chelsea staff member Sam Bethell.
Now you ask yourself why Evra, a pretty cool-headed player, was involved in a brawl with some obscure staff member.
According to a report from the FA in The Telegraph, Bethell allegedly shouted "I’ll f***ing have you, you f***ing immigrant," at Evra. However, the Chelsea staffer responded by saying he called the Frenchman a "f***ing idiot."
The FA charged Chelsea with racism, then dismissed the charges, even though Manchester United first team coach Mike Phelan and goalkeeping coach Richard Hartis testified that they heard Bethal racially vilify Evra.
For more information, please read The Telegraph's text of the FA report regarding this incident.
From memory accounts from both sides ie Chelsea and Manchester United players and staff were all inconsistent hence the FA saying that there was no case to answer.
The Chelsea groundsman would be within his rights to sue Phelan though if he felt that Phelan had made a defamatory public statement. However, I don't think Phelan ever issued a statement or spoke to the press about the matter, he just answered the questions put to him by the FA. In contrast Chelsea made a public statement accusing Clattenburg of racism against a Spanish player and then, having taken independent legal advice, they withdrew the accusation before any authorities had had a chance to get involved.
I know you'd like the two incidents to be the same Paige but I'm afraid they're not.
Cue daily repetition of The Sad Tale of the Cruel Case of the Wronged Humanitarian Luis Suarez
The only difference is Evra got banned for 4 games for making false racist accusations.
That's not what he got banned for. He was banned for fighting with the groundsman and Chelsea were fined because of their employee's conduct.
