See, I would have had that down as a serious question and not a bad wum-attempt if only you didn't use the phrase "ridiculously petulant." Can you engage me in debate without insulting me, Drogs? I've obviously got under your skin at some point in the past.
The use of the words "ridiculously petulant." Why "ridiculous" and how so "petulant"? You don't know me; you're not in the room with me when I'm typing my comments; you have no idea what my state of mind is. If you knew me, you'd fully comprehend just how silly your comments are. I spend a most of my time laughing at the things I write, there's no petulance at all. And whilst you might find some of the things I write to be ridiculous, that's your opinion, and not a very flattering one of me. Have I explained to you clearly enough, now, how the insult and abuse has come about, or would you like me to expand further?
HIAG, you should really read things through, waste of a post. "Ridiculously petulant name changing" is what I said. You can't complain about being called Spuds when you use Chavs/Mad Dog or any other ****e you spout.
There you go again! Now you are implying that I cannot comprehend simple English. Rather than continue to seek to undermine me, why don't you try, just for once, to refrain from using language intended to put others down? Avoidance of words such as "ridiculous" and "petulant" would be a very good place to start.
So now you've changed from them being winners to them showing the capacity to be winners LOL. You just can't bear to give Jose the credit can you. He made them winners not by some mystical sense that they had capacity to be winners.
And that was with their wonderful start - 22/24 points. And a hell of a lot bigger gap the season before. But remember your invincible after 2 games - a long time to go before you can be proved wrong.
I can and will give him credit but he inherited players who had every chance of success whoever was the manager. SAF was fortunate to have a crop of young players in the mid 90s who were destined to be winners. But it remains to be the seen if the present Chelsea players are similarly capable and how Mourinho will react if they are not. It's a bit too soon for him to be so smug. Spurs have been Chelsea's equals in the PL over the past two seasons - despite the vast sums spent of foreign stars. His sniggering over gazumping Spurs for Willian was a bit too smug and cocky for a man who hasn't made a mark yet with this team since his return. That is what has irritated many posting on this thread.
Not your, you are or you're. Haven't actually seen any Chelsea fans mention invincible but I'm sure you have
here is being a twat as per usual, he's talking about Rooney - Mourinho: "Let's say we make the bid, and they say no again, what do we lose? One e-mail. Why keep an unhappy player" #CFC #MUFC (DailyStar)
good god, what an idiot, i hope to god we batter them on monday - http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/aug/24/jose-mourinho-wayne-rooney
He forgot to say my number one (and only) transfer choice, and maybe a little credability for being so smug and trying to play mind games.
looks like he has no intentions of signing Rooney (from the article you linked to Matth). Chelsea have already added André Schürrle and Marco van Ginkel to their midfield ranks during the transfer window and are expected to confirm the arrival of Brazilian Willian "We are going to get a maximum of two players in this transfer window," added Mourinho
sorry to burst your bubble but we haven't 'tapped' them up, it was Everton who made the bid public not us.
Surely comments stating that they're being held back at Everton would amount to tapping them up? Or is that all fair in Matthland?
