Clarification sought by Minty

Hoopster67 · Feb 12, 2012

rogueleader said: ↑

to be a bit more serious...I think murray was just sick of the whole thing, he hadnt had the kind of success he needed to feed his massive spend a tenner to their fiver ego....there was no prospect of that changing, his other interests which he had used to finance rangers and his ego were going down the tubes, he was finally copping some long overdue criticism, the succulent lamb,smoke and mirrors werent working any longer ...and he saw an opportunity to offload the whole pile of **** on a convenient fall guy - whyte ( who has his own agenda which will , no doubt , be of benefit to whyte. rangers on -field fortunes are in reality a side issue for him ...and that agenda very much relies on blaming previous owners for the perilous state of the club )
However, whyte keeps on making derogatory statements about the state of the club and the finances which he inherited from the old regime.
Murrays ego cant possibly cope with that, his legacy, as he sees it must be getting tarnished. That kind of thing will keep a man of moonbeams arrogance awake, night after night, seething.

Rogue, I hope you are right in what you say, but i am getting an uneasy feeling about the whole takeover thing. From our point of view it appears almost too good to be true the way they are lurching from one disaster to another with Whyte. Has he stepped in to be the fall guy and get the debts written off and clear the decks? thus leaving the way open for a real "saviour " to step forward. Are they smart enough for that? I dont know, maybe I am just being "paranoid" [again].
Click to expand...

Clarification sought by Minty

Hoopster67 Well-Known Member

Share This Page

About Us

Quick Navigation

Like us on Facebook

Buy us a beer!

Useful Searches

Clarification sought by Minty

Hoopster67 Well-Known Member

Share This Page