This is going to sound like sour grapes but really not intended to be. We're not going through to the last 16 because we don't deserve to, no arguments. This is intended to be a thread to discuss the relative merits of being in the CL.
My personal experience is that I can't afford to go to many matches. This season I made the effort to get me and my son to the CL match at "home" against Bayer L. As I've said, this was quite a significant expenditure for me, so I was hoping for some good entertainment. We certainly enjoyed the experience to a certain extent and there was a good atmosphere before the match. Unfortunately we were also treated to a very disappointing performance but more importantly we were treated to some not very pleasing tactics by an experienced CL side. Which is the main point of this posting and sorry it's taken so long to get round to it.
I didn't time how long we spent watching the opposition writhing around on the floor because they'd been slightly touched, but it was significant and far more than the ref awarded as extra time. But that's the point isn't it - there's always a degree of desperation added by going over 90 regardless of how much time you have extra, and that tends to suit the team that has manufactured the extra time. Also the ref will never add on the true total of extra time he should over five or six minutes, and I believe we were due way way more than that. Sure you can say that however much extra we had we'd never have scored but that is not my point. I am arguing the principle of it with reference to this particular match, not how it would have affected that one match. So with my hard earned we watched the antics of an experienced CL team running down the clock and apparently Spurs have a lot to learn in the CL.
But learn what? Learn to feign injury? Learn to stamp on people and not get noticed? Learn to generally time waste and "be clever" - because all that is cheating as far as I'm concerned and that is something I'd rather not be learning. And UEFA and the pundits will never address this for what it is or stop it. And meanwhile the main cheating going on is cheating the public out of watching good football.
So yes we potentially could have beaten all the teams in our group, and the reason we didn't is certainly not to do with these antics - but it certainly didn't help. And if that is what you are going to see in the CL then I want nothing to do with it. Give me the PL any day, because apart from lots of money I can't think of a good reason for being in the CL (especially since probably only three teams can actually win it), and even that amount of money isn't enough to compete with the dodgily financed "top" teams anyway!
My personal experience is that I can't afford to go to many matches. This season I made the effort to get me and my son to the CL match at "home" against Bayer L. As I've said, this was quite a significant expenditure for me, so I was hoping for some good entertainment. We certainly enjoyed the experience to a certain extent and there was a good atmosphere before the match. Unfortunately we were also treated to a very disappointing performance but more importantly we were treated to some not very pleasing tactics by an experienced CL side. Which is the main point of this posting and sorry it's taken so long to get round to it.
I didn't time how long we spent watching the opposition writhing around on the floor because they'd been slightly touched, but it was significant and far more than the ref awarded as extra time. But that's the point isn't it - there's always a degree of desperation added by going over 90 regardless of how much time you have extra, and that tends to suit the team that has manufactured the extra time. Also the ref will never add on the true total of extra time he should over five or six minutes, and I believe we were due way way more than that. Sure you can say that however much extra we had we'd never have scored but that is not my point. I am arguing the principle of it with reference to this particular match, not how it would have affected that one match. So with my hard earned we watched the antics of an experienced CL team running down the clock and apparently Spurs have a lot to learn in the CL.
But learn what? Learn to feign injury? Learn to stamp on people and not get noticed? Learn to generally time waste and "be clever" - because all that is cheating as far as I'm concerned and that is something I'd rather not be learning. And UEFA and the pundits will never address this for what it is or stop it. And meanwhile the main cheating going on is cheating the public out of watching good football.
So yes we potentially could have beaten all the teams in our group, and the reason we didn't is certainly not to do with these antics - but it certainly didn't help. And if that is what you are going to see in the CL then I want nothing to do with it. Give me the PL any day, because apart from lots of money I can't think of a good reason for being in the CL (especially since probably only three teams can actually win it), and even that amount of money isn't enough to compete with the dodgily financed "top" teams anyway!
.