Yeah but your a special case - you like to poke the bear ….. no pun intendedI lasted an hour
Off Topic CL, ITTV and other forums (merged)
- Thread starter User deleted as requested
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
He's fair game.Yeah but your a special case - you like to poke the bear ….. no pun intended
At least I have one
A blow up doll doesn’t count.
Surely that’s just a matter of searching the history books back to 1905
You have gone soft since you were booted off here, I thought you'd at least have brought my dog into the reply
I think Nathan Jones is a good judge of a player.
If he’s wishing to recruit players he’s worked with before it’s no bad thing.
If he’s wishing to recruit players he’s worked with before it’s no bad thing.
Let’s hope he’s given the budget to get who he wants
We'll soon find out.
Something tells me it'll end in tears, and the fiery Jones will stand up for himself.
ITTApologist is a forum not allowing or accepting views against the majority, the majority being created as criticism of the club in any form is frowned upon.
SeriouslyRidiculous is a shocking wum, Mundain supports his rubbish
It does beg the question why Kojak was banned, he does not insult posters, but his eloquent posts which on many occasions are correct.
Ridiculous wums and does not get a ban, Kojak gets his knuckles wrapped and red carded.
A rule for one and a rule for others.
As for me, I got banned after one post!
SeriouslyRidiculous is a shocking wum, Mundain supports his rubbish
It does beg the question why Kojak was banned, he does not insult posters, but his eloquent posts which on many occasions are correct.
Ridiculous wums and does not get a ban, Kojak gets his knuckles wrapped and red carded.
A rule for one and a rule for others.
As for me, I got banned after one post!
I never insulted other posters either, but I got bannedITTApologist is a forum not allowing or accepting views against the majority, the majority being created as criticism of the club in any form is frowned upon.
SeriouslyRidiculous is a shocking wum, Mundain supports his rubbish
It does beg the question why Kojak was banned, he does not insult posters, but his eloquent posts which on many occasions are correct.
Ridiculous wums and does not get a ban, Kojak gets his knuckles wrapped and red carded.
A rule for one and a rule for others.
As for me, I got banned after one post!
But you got flak then booted off I remember correctly.I never insulted other posters either, but I got banned
Wasps get twatted - bees are let out the window
Yes. My main offence seemed to be asking for evidence for various unsubstantiated claims.
I still don’t know why I actually got banned.
You’ll have to ask DP about that
That’s what made you a wasp - your not allowed to question the hierarchyYes. My main offence seemed to be asking for evidence for various unsubstantiated claims.
I still don’t know why I actually got banned.
You’ll have to ask DP about that
Yes. My main offence seemed to be asking for evidence for various unsubstantiated claims.
I still don’t know why I actually got banned.
You’ll have to ask DP about that
I have no idea, at the time I didn't know you had been banned. It wasn't me who banned you. Nice **** stirring though.
Yes. My main offence seemed to be asking for evidence for various unsubstantiated claims.
I still don’t know why I actually got banned.
You’ll have to ask DP about that
I remember that well, the shelf stacker called you all sorts.Perhaps calling out bull**** hurt
I thought the “ogling Reader’s Wives in your Y fronts” was his finest jibe.
Perhaps calling out bull**** hurt