Chuck

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Your quoted figures were wrong, you used the 18% increase in government payments alongside a figure of "nearly 4.5m smackeroos", when that figure was the amount of tax he paid back to the exchequer, which was an increase of 26%, so in reality he made the state around an extra £600,000.
I did not say you hated anyone either, I just despaired at people like you who use BS figures just to siuit their/your own agendas, so please don't claim I've made anything up, when all I've done is prove you're wrong, something you still haven't admitted to either.

RReal - dont waste keystrokes on this Muppet. Losers like him will never take off the emerald tints. He has form for going off on one, when his arguments are picked apart <doh>

As I say, him and his ilk are strangers to facts and the truth. FACT <ok>

Best avoided.
 
RReal - dont waste keystrokes on this Muppet. Losers like him will never take off the emerald tints. He has form for going off on one, when his arguments are picked apart <doh>

As I say, him and his ilk are strangers to facts and the truth. FACT <ok>

Best avoided.

Be quiet you sad little virgin <ok>
 
<ok> What Edge said.

What was 'anti British' in my comment? I merely made comment, as a UK taxpayer, about bacon ears getting his lifestyle underwritten by said taxpayers. I do not think it is correct that ordinary British folk have to subsidise him and his family. Do you see 'Britain' as being soley tied up with the Windsor clan? WOW. Where did I deny the holocaust by the way? Are you telling lies in a thread that you accused others of lieing in? Naughty.
 
RReal - dont waste keystrokes on this Muppet. Losers like him will never take off the emerald tints. He has form for going off on one, when his arguments are picked apart <doh>

As I say, him and his ilk are strangers to facts and the truth. FACT <ok>

Best avoided.

When have you ever picked anyones argument apart?

Reallyreal, I got the figures mixed up, I am profusely sorry old chap. My humblest. The fact remains though that Chuck and his fellow inbreds are taking money out of the pockets of people who are being forced to tighten their belts. Surely wrong? Why is no one able to disagree on here without veering into insults?
 
My problem is not the fact that this public money is being spent, but rather what it is being spent on. The money spent on keeping the Royal Family would be better spent on services that actually make a difference in ordinary people's lives.
 
My problem is not the fact that this public money is being spent, but rather what it is being spent on. The money spent on keeping the Royal Family would be better spent on services that actually make a difference in ordinary people's lives.

Who would provide the 'pomp and circumstance' for Lightfoot and Really to tug their tiddlers too though?
 
Taken for us far too soon. Gone but NEVER forgotten.


You must log in or register to see images
 
Another anti British rant from a nationalist Irish(wo)man?

If we'd had listened to you in WW2, we'd all be speaking German FFS!!

Listened to me in WW2? I wasn't born untill 1979 chum.
 
Edge what would be so terrible wrong with speaking German.
I thought members of your Royal Family have Royal blood.
Maybe if we were speaking German, young children may have the opportunity of a better start in life.
Maybe we could still make are own cars and maybe just we all would have a better share of our wealth.