Chelsea v QPR

Scum

 

Chelsea Fulham 1977 55,003
Chelsea QPR 1977 21,103

Chelsea QPR
1980-81 23,381
1981-82 18,365
1982-83 20,821

and then attendances from 17k- 24k from 1984-1995 at the Bridge; some draw QPR!!!



Chelsea Fulham

1979-80 30,657
1982-83 29,797
1983-84 31,947

PS Abramovich left parliament last year so cannot be held politically responsible for Crimea, but whatever helps you sleep at night.

In terms of you catching Chelsea up, you are losing money, tinpot, got no revenue and s**t. Whereas when we were losing money we were winning trophies and had big revenue. You are not even on the curve

 

What an insightful contribution.

 

Have we got ANY songs about the Queens? No. We have one or two about Fulham.

Queens sing about us home and away every game.

Even when we aren't in the same division as us, they sing their racist Drogba AIDS song.

 

Whaaaaaaaat?

 

http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/...ongs-about-Didier-Drogba-and-John-Terry-s-mum

 

Hard to take it on face value that those stats about are correct or you are clearly missing something out… how else can you explain a difference of 24,000 for one game in 1977?! More than double the attendance???

And any way my point about the majority of your fans being post Ambraovich so not really getting it still stands. Local rivalry was still strong 70’s and 80’s and 90’s and we've got a good hit rate of making you notice us this decade as well- whether or not Fulham was a bigger deal for some of that period, maybe because of the history and location of your ground the point still stands.

As for your Abramovich comments- showing your ignorance there to think that they only target standing members of parliament… you better hope Putin behaves himself

 

Honestly Peter, I can't tell nothing but the sincere truth - you were never on our radar in all my (many) years.

QPR was a day on the lash for us and we went where we wanted when we wanted both on your terraces and around your ground. It is quite simply the way it was and your older lot of whom I have many good mates will testify. Coming to our place ( or not as was the case) you were nothing more than a joke and no more of a pull than Crewe would be today.

Even in modern times I don't even remotely dislike your club because apart from our 90 minutes when we play each other you don't really matter that much.

The facts are simple. 99 / 100 Rangers fans despise Chelsea. 99 / 100 Chelsea fans don't give a flying f00k about you lot.

 

You sure about that EC? You obviously know your own Club better than me but I have a hard time imagining anyone having a serious rivalry with the Ruperts

 

London's Only must be the 1 out of 100 Chelsea fan who does give a flying f00k. I reckon he must have been sodomised by the QPR away fans. On the up side, there aren't many of them apparently.

 

One thing I will agree with you on is that there are and historically has been more pathetic ****s following Chelsea that think it's impressive to act like Danny Dyer or probably more like Frankie Fryer.

High five for you

 

34000 not 24000.

We've been hearing this when Roman gets sanctioned Chelsea are f**ed from the same people that said Roman will get bored and leave us.

They must be running out of straws at Lidl in W12.

Asset freezes and visa bans apply to 119 persons while 23 entities are subject to a freeze of their assets in the EU. This includes 113 persons and 10 entities responsible for action against Ukraine's territorial integrity, six persons providing support to or benefitting Russian decision-makers and 13 entities in Crimea and Sevastopol that were confiscated or that have benefitted from a transfer of ownership contrary to Ukrainian law.

If it was going to happen, it would most likely have happened already despite the Daily Mail hype.

Here is more info on why it is unlikely to effect Roman:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/b...s-losing-no-sleep-over-sanctions-9695709.html
http://www.cityam.com/1406252403/lawyers-targeting-oligarchs-won-t-work

 

Here's MY info on why it won't affect Roman:

please log in to view this image

 

Don't take it out on me mate. It isn't my fault your following were the spotty Harry Potter types and we owned Loftus Road. Additionally, I can't help the fact we just didn't give a ****e about you. After all, off the pitch you were non existent and on it your trophy haul mirrored that of Oxford. You to us are similar to what the Mancs feel about Stockport. It is what it is!

 

Had some fun times at Loftus Road. Only Div 1 ground in the 80s and 90s you could take the piss and go wherever you want: paddock, Ellerslie was a Chelsea stand in effect, South Africa Upper. Boxing Day 84 and Milk Cup QF 86 was particularly funny in terms of having three sides of the ground. Even cup replay mid 90s we had all of Ellerslie and Rangers fans were shamed again.

To be fair, everyone took the piss at LR, United, Liverpool, West Ham

 

We get this twice a year every year QPR are in the same division as us. A handful of fans coming on here to make out this is some big rivalry and that we should really care about playing QPR.

As I said before, you're just another team in the way of 3 points. I've been going to Chelsea since the 80's and really couldn't give 2 ****s about you outside of the 180 minutes. Though now you have Rio it will be extra nice to beat you, hopefully JT bags the winner

 

Chelsea 3 (Rio OG, Terry, Remy) QPR 2

 

Well obviously it isn’t the same as a Stockport and United. Only have to go back to the 90’s for when we were a better side than you and the historic gap between the two sides in terms of support and league position is not comparable in living memory.

And your really are thick if you think that Chelsea fans are somehow inherently stronger… really are showing yourself to be a child there.

QPR arent like Fulham. Your fans are actually more like Fulham because your grounds in Fulham!!!

Go back 20, 30 40 years and both the QPR fans and Chelsea fans are mainly working class. Only difference was there were more Chelsea fans than Rangers fans.

Fast forward to now, the majority of Chelsea are probably more likely to have the second name Wong than Smith but those living in the UK are also more likely to be a double barrelled toff and the Rangers fans are still in the main of the same roots that have always supported them. So in the past there was no difference but now it’s the Chelsea fans who without doubt can give the Ruperts a run for there money.

Doesn’t bother me but that must really hurt you.

If you’ve got some inside information that Ukraine situation is all cushdi and Russian definitely wont try and annex Donetsek or set it up as another country or think sod it lets not worry about who controls ports in Odessa or Mariupol then you better get yourself down where I am in the City and spread the word.

If things genuinely do escalate then I’m sure they can find a way to influence those people like Abramovich who can influence Putin

 

You QPR lot are like the one night stand who doesn't get the hint in the morning.

WE DONT CARE ABOUT YOU!!

Its not because Chelsea fans are all post Roman glory hunters, it's because we've moved on to much bigger and better things. When most seasons we're playing the likes of Barca and Bayern in the C.L, why would we get all excited over QPR who can barely fill their ground against us (despite being massive rivals apparently).

 

If Putin annexes X, there may be sanctions against Y which may effect Z.

If, if, if Peter.

Chelsea fc is a self-sufficient well-run club that is top of the league on a £10m net spend.

We haven't needed Roman's extra cash for years.

May you should ask your city friends about qpr's finances. Net spend £20m, in 20th place.